Eric, look at it this way -- it has been realized the documentation problem
affects just about everyone. We fix the documentation problem for all
categories and our P cars are along for the ride.
I.e. when you need a spec, you would get time to get the spec if you don't
happen to have it already.
For us P guys, the spec might even be in the GCR rather than the FSM (if
built to GCR). We all, Stock to Mod, get a broader choice of source material
and lose the fear of DQ just because it is not in our hip pocket.
--Rocky
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>
To: "'Mark Andy'" <mark@sccaprepared.com>; "'autox mailing list'"
<autox@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 9:47 PM
Subject: RE: Subject: Re: shop manuals
> <<
> You haven't been reading the thread for a while, have you?
> >>
>
> True I haven't.
>
> <<
> We were discussing documentation requirements for all cars. We were
> also
> discussing how a PC could request documentation appropriate for the
> situation, and that that documentation could come from a FSM, dealer, or
>
> other source.
>
> Right now, you're "combatively agreeing" with much that I've (and Rocky)
>
> has already said.
> >>
>
> How could the documenation requirements be the same for a Raynard that
> runs in Mod be the same as a Honda Civic in Stock?
>
> Eitherway, I still don't get the 'intent' of the request for comment
> about FSM's in Prepared.
>
> Regards,
> e
|