ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Course design and surface was: Re: Larry and: Oakland lives

To: ba-autox@autox.team.net
Subject: RE: Course design and surface was: Re: Larry and: Oakland lives
From: Carl Merritt <cmerritt@ati.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 11:56:01 -0800
> Excuse the long rambling... but I just gotta put in my 2 cents.

Let me throw in a couple more cents on a related topic.  Some finish-line
setup bashing is below, so please delete now if you are likely to take it
too personally:

The finish line S was very neat, I loved it.  Taking a wide entrance into
the first part of the S rewarded me every lap by reducing the S into a quick
little slalom.  

It was also entertaining in a way to watch people try to go tight into the
first part of the S, not have enough room to brake, and slamming into a wall
of cones.  Made for grate photo opportunities.

However, I question it's placement right before the finish line.  I saw a
couple times where course workers tripped the timing lights while setting up
cones, causing several re-runs, and I heard that at least once somebody lost
it and took the timing lights out, causing even more delays.

Is a technically challenging finish a common thing for Divisional/National
events?  If not, then why not put that excellent little piece of course
design in the middle of the course and keep the finish line clean?

-Carl

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: Course design and surface was: Re: Larry and: Oakland lives, Carl Merritt <=