chapman-era
[Top] [All Lists]

Fw: suspension geometry - 2nd installment

To: "chapman" <chapman-era@Autox.Team.Net>
Subject: Fw: suspension geometry - 2nd installment
From: "phil.bradshaw" <phil.bradshaw@clear.net.nz>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 97 20:18:55 PDT
Phil Bradshaw
Auckland NZ

Leitch Supersprint 20 Valve Lotus 7 Replica
Anglia 105GZE Supercharged 4AGZE Clubcar Project

phil.bradshaw@clear.net.nz
64-9-4455509 W/Fax
64-9-4437055 H

----------
> Date: Monday, 2 June 1997 20:14:01 
> From: phil.bradshaw
> To: mods; kitracers; chapman
> Subject: suspension geometry - 2nd installment
> 
> Thanx for the excellent advice some of you have sent. Silly me deleted the
> really good reply I got from someone off the mods list - please re-send,
> whoever you were!
> 
> My main question is to do with lower arm length and geometry. The comment
> that the arm should descend slightly to the strut - is this so that the
> line between the actual ball joint and inner pivot bush is horizontal at
> mormal ride height, or should even this line be descending, hence giving
> increased camber to the outside wheel as the car initially goes into roll
> when cornering, before extra compression starts to reduce camber? If I
> figure this right, wouldn't this feature make the inner wheel change
camber
> even greater under droop as the weight transfers (granted the greater load
> is on the outside wheel) and therefore assist in grip? How much is enuff!
> 
> As for arm length - short arms give greater camber change - is this good
or
> bad?! I am seriously considering fabricating lower arms with some degree
of
> adjustability. I will fabricate a cross member and engine mounts, so
> anything within reason is possible.
> 
> I figure the only way I can control bump steer is to buld my own steering
> arms (hence the capri struts - the arms bolt on - and my ackerman angle
> queries) to ensure the steering arm ball joints are co-incident with the
> control arm outer balljoint and the tie rod inner ball joint is in line
> with the inner control arm pivot. (and hence the anti-dive question, to
get
> them all on the same plane - or at least as close as possible)
> 
> Steering will be rack and pinion - I was considering a mini rack housing
> with herald rack and pinion inside (rack must sit behind axle centres -
> hence the mini rack) however if i am fabricating steering arms then I may
> as well use the toyota rack and shorten the arms to get the ratio
> up.Comments?  Any thoughts on total turns lock to lock? I believe escort
> quickracks were about 2 1/2 turns. Any thoughts? 
> 
> FWIW I reckon the Anglia will weigh no more than 850 kg, and probably even
> less.
> 
> Thanx again
> 
> Phil Bradshaw
> Auckland NZ
> 
> Leitch Supersprint 20 Valve Lotus 7 Replica
> Anglia 105GZE Supercharged 4AGZE Clubcar Project
> 
> phil.bradshaw@clear.net.nz
> 64-9-4455509 W/Fax
> 64-9-4437055 H



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>