>From what I know, the price seems about right for the size of the pix.
Framing can be expensive... to do it right. If you go cheap, you can have
your picture ruined in short order, the first time it gets humid. If the
"art" is precious to you go the expense to have it done right.
Greg Petrolati
>From: "Roger Beasley" <beeline@iline.com>
>Reply-To: "Roger Beasley" <beeline@iline.com>
>To: <fot@autox.team.net>
>Subject: Triumph/MG Photo Framing
>Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 13:54:20 -0400
>
>Amici,
>
>At the risk of sounding cheap, I wanted to ask about others' experience in
>getting the 50"x10" panoramic photo from Mid-Ohio framed.
>
>The guy we use when we get frames made here for work just quoted me $80 to
>have the photo put in a plain black aluminum frame with plain glass. No
>matting, nothing fancy. Non-glare glass or lexan were even more. I guess
>I was expecting something less than the $45 I paid for the photo.
>
>How does that price compare with your experiences? Did he see me coming or
>is that "the rate"?
>
>Bye-the-way, the photo is great and never fails to impress. It was a big
>hit at last night's meeting of the British Car Club of SW Florida.
>
>Roger Beasley
>'62 TR4 Vintage Racer
|