Re: catch cans

fot

Re: catch cans

To:	ryoung@navcomtech.com, fot@autox.team.net
Subject:	Re: catch cans
From:	WEmery7451@aol.com
Date:	Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:40:41 EST

== fot at autox.team.net supported in part by Fat Chance Garage
==    http://fatchancegarage.com



In a message dated 11/21/05 6:52:42 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
ryoung@navcomtech.com writes:

<< Triumphs was inadequate to prevent positive pressure in the crankcase under
 sustained WOT operation even on a 'fresh' engine, let alone one with 50,000
 miles on it. >>

An alternate solution would be to buy a couple of respirators.


===  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: catch cans, (continued) Re: catch cans, EDWARD BARNARD Re: catch cans, Charly Mitchel RE: catch cans, Bill Babcock Re: catch cans, Richard Good Fwd: Re: catch cans, EDWARD BARNARD RE: Re: catch cans, Randall Re: catch cans, BillDentin Re: Re: catch cans, Greg Solow RE: Re: catch cans, Guyots3 RE: Re: catch cans, Randall Re: catch cans, WEmery7451 <=

Previous by Date:	Hallett camping and other information, Susan Kahler
Next by Date:	Re: TR4 front springs, Jeff Quick
Previous by Thread:	RE: Re: catch cans, Randall
Next by Thread:	All TR-3s eligible for VSCCA - was Re: VSCCA news flash, Bill Sohl
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]