fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fot] Camshaft recommendation

To: Richard Good <goodparts@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [Fot] Camshaft recommendation
From: "van.mulders.marcel--- via Fot" <fot@autox.team.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:22:25 +0100 (CET)
Cc: fot <fot@autox.team.net>
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: fot@autox.team.net
References: <538606738.3167859.1582002143213.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <538606738.3167859.1582002143213@mail.yahoo.com>
Thread-index: tgckLEKbPB3fIXDFZAlPUMfRMG8nYw==
Thread-topic: Camshaft recommendation
--===============7501334490138290676==
        boundary="=_0e5e4368-283e-4567-88ce-c9ed095f3a39"

--=_0e5e4368-283e-4567-88ce-c9ed095f3a39
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Richard,=20
I agree (after reading it 3 times to understand it).=20
The possibility of speeding up the tappet velocity is limited though : it i=
s this problem that cam grinders encounter when they try to get very fast v=
alve opening. It's common agreed that very fast valve opening (steep flank)=
 with less overlap is an advantage, but there are limits.=20
Marcel=20


Van: "Richard Good" <goodparts@verizon.net>=20
Aan: "van mulders marcel" <van.mulders.marcel@telenet.be>=20
Cc: "fot" <fot@autox.team.net>=20
Verzonden: Dinsdag 18 februari 2020 06:02:23=20
Onderwerp: Re: [Fot] Camshaft recommendation=20



Marcel,=20

If you were to reduce the tappet velocity of the lower lift cam by 13% as w=
ell as reducing the cam lift then there would be no point. But if you grind=
 the lower lift cam with the same lifter velocity as the high lift cam then=
 the high ratio rockers will give you 13% higher valve speed than the high =
lift cam with stock rockers.=20

Richard=20

Sent from AOL Mobile Mail=20
Get the new AOL app: mail.mobile.aol.com=20


On Wednesday, February 12, 2020 van.mulders.marcel < van.mulders.marcel@tel=
enet.be > wrote:=20

Richard,=20
dare I answer again...=20
You say :" first decide what will be the optimum lift for your engine , the=
n... ": in that case : what is the point of high ratio rocker arms, if you =
want to end at the same maximum valve lift? With a higher lobe x lower rock=
er ratio, the valve opening speed will be the same and you have a lower for=
ce (load) at the pushrods and lobe/cam followers. I think the only reason f=
or a higher rocker ratio is the camfollowers having a too small a diameter =
to be able to get at the maximum valve lift you want?=20
Marcel=20

Van: "Richard Good" <goodparts@verizon.net>=20
Aan: "van mulders marcel" <van.mulders.marcel@telenet.be>=20
Cc: "fot" <fot@autox.team.net>=20
Verzonden: Woensdag 12 februari 2020 17:25:10=20
Onderwerp: Re: [Fot] Camshaft recommendation=20



Marcel,=20

Yes, if you increase rocker ratio and do not change the cam lift, the maxim=
um lift will also increase by 13%.=20

Richard=20

Sent from AOL Mobile Mail=20
Get the new AOL app: mail.mobile.aol.com=20

On Wednesday, February 12, 2020 van.mulders.marcel < van.mulders.marcel@tel=
enet.be > wrote:=20
Richard,=20
dare I answer this...=20
Do you mean that, with the higher rocker ratio, the valve is moving faster =
in the first part of the opening phase and hence moving slower nearing the =
maximum lift? Suppose the cam lift of both camshafts is such that the maxim=
um lift is 13mm for both the 1.65 and 1.50 ratio and duration at 0.050" is =
240=C2=B0, thus the crank has to move 120=C2=B0 to go from 0.050" lift to m=
aximum lift in both cases. If the valve is opening 13% faster all the way f=
rom 0.050" lift untill maximum lift, the maximum lift will also be 13% high=
er! When an engine is at, say 5000rpm or any other speed, it takes the same=
 time to move 120=C2=B0 (from 0.050" to maximum lift) : the rocker arm rati=
o does not change that and the valve that is opening 13% faster with the 1.=
65 ratio will end at a maximum lift that is also 13% higher.=20
Marcel=20

Van: "Richard Good" <goodparts@verizon.net>)=20
Aan: "Michael Zbarsky" <mzbarsky@yahoo.com>, gkbyrne@optusnet.com.au, "van =
mulders marcel" <van.mulders.marcel@telenet.be>=20

Cc: "fot" <fot@autox.team.net>=20
Verzonden: Woensdag 12 februari 2020 02:23:07=20
Onderwerp: Re: [Fot] Camshaft recommendation=20
7.887=20


Michael,=20

People often seem to overlook the main performance benefit of increasing th=
e rocker ratio. That is the increase in valve velocity. The velocity of a f=
lat tappet is limited by it's diameter. If you grind the cam lobe for too m=
uch velocity the contact patch will move out past the edge of the lifter an=
d things will self destruct. So tappet velocity is limited. However, since =
tappet velocity times rocker ratio equals valve velocity, increasing the ro=
cker ratio will increase valve velocity.=20

First decide what will be the optimum valve lift for your engine then divid=
e by rocker ratio to determine the net cam lift needed to achieve that valv=
e lift. Yes, you can grind the cam with a large enough lobe to reach desire=
d lift using stock rockers but you are limited in how fast you can open the=
 valve. Now if you grind the cam with less lift then use 1.65:1 rockers to =
reach that same desired valve lift you will be moving the valve about 13% f=
aster. That means it will be open further in a given period of time. Graph =
it out and you will see a big difference. Valve velocity is a huge factor i=
n performance.=20

I can understand why someone who has tried to use high ratio rockers with a=
 cam that was already maxing out the valve lift with stock rockers would de=
cide that high ratio does not work. Valve lift was already at max. Increasi=
ng it further may be a detriment. If duration was also maxed out for reason=
able torque then the increase in lift during the overlap period caused by t=
he increase in rocker ratio may reduce the low end torque. Properly applied=
 with the right cam profile, high ratio rockers enable performance that is =
just not achievable with stock rockers.=20

Richard Good=20
Good Parts Inc=20

Sent from AOL Mobile Mail=20
Get the new AOL app: mail.mobile.aol.com=20

On Tuesday, February 11, 2020 Michael Zbarsky via Fot < mzbarsky@yahoo.com =
> wrote:=20
Thanks everyone! Good stuff. I=E2=80=99m sticking to a redline of just over=
 6K. I=E2=80=99d also like to keep the 1.65 setup rather than invest in a 1=
.55 so keep the intel and suggestions coming. The GP3 is a definite contend=
er.=20

Mike=20





On Monday, February 10, 2020, 4:07 PM, Geoff Byrne <gkbyrne@optusnet.com.au=
> wrote:=20


Ditch the 1.65 rockers no good for racing=20
Geoff Byrne=20
TR6 racer down under=20

Sent from my iPhone=20


BQ_BEGIN
On 11 Feb 2020, at 12:52 am, van.mulders.marcel--- via Fot <fot@autox.team.=
net> wrote:=20





BQ_BEGIN

I also once bought a Goodparts 1.65 rocker roller assembly for a TR6 engine=
, but in the end I had to use a 1.55 roller rocker assembly, also from Good=
parts, because, with the 1.65, it is difficult to find a race camshaft with=
 a lobe lift that is low enough. With lobes of 8mm or higher, I could not f=
ind valve springs to cope with the high valve lift. I bought a G5 camshaft =
from Schneider, they call it the 320-F grind (duration is 268=C2=B0 at 0.05=
0", timing is 57-83 87-53 , installation figure is then 103=C2=B0 :is that =
the same as the G5 grind?) with 0.340"/8.6mm cam lift and that makes for a =
valve lift of 12.9mm with the 1.55 rocker arms. With 1.65 rockers , valve l=
ift would be 14.2mm and I could not find valve springs for that lift. The v=
alve springs I used are part no 281003-063.20 from Summit (Isky), 320lb/inc=
h spring rate. They recommend 0.45"/11.43mm (1.250" - 0.800"from closed to =
full open position, so it is about 1.4mm more in my engine, but there is no=
 problem concerning coil binding : the installed height is a 1mm more than =
1.250 , the pressure in closed position is lower of course, but still 34kgs=
 (105kgs at full lift) an that seems to be enough till 7500 rpm=20
Racetorations have a race cam with 7.6mm cam lift, probably that would work=
 with 1.65 rocker arms. I still have the 1.65 rocker assembly, it is new an=
d it could work with a road cam or any camshaft with a maximum of 8mm cam l=
ift.=20
Marcel=20


Van: "fot" <fot@autox.team.net>=20
Aan: "fot" <fot@autox.team.net>=20
Verzonden: Maandag 10 februari 2020 02:34:27=20
Onderwerp: [Fot] Camshaft recommendation=20

Hi all, I=E2=80=99m building a TR6 race engine and have a set of 1.65 ratio=
 roller rockers from Goodparts. Any recommendations for a suitable camshaft=
? I will be putting in cam bearings.=20

Thanks, Mike=20



_______________________________________________=20
fot@autox.team.net=20

http://www.fot-racing.com=20

Archive: http://autox.team.net/archive http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot=20
arcel@telenet.be=20

_______________________________________________=20
fot@autox.team.net=20

http://www.fot-racing.com=20

Archive: http://autox.team.net/archive http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot=20

home.com.au=20




BQ_END


BQ_BEGIN

BQ_END

BQ_END

_______________________________________________=20
[ mailto:fot@autox.team.net | fot@autox.team.net ]=20

[ http://www.fot-racing.com/ | http://www.fot-racing.com ]=20

 ]=20
Archive: [ http://autox.team.net/archive | http://autox.team.net/archive  ]=
 [ http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot | http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot ]=
=20
erizon.net | http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/goodparts@verizon.ne=
t ]=20






--=_0e5e4368-283e-4567-88ce-c9ed095f3a39
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><body><div style=3D"font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-seri=
f; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000"><div>Richard,&nbsp;</div><div>I agree (=
after reading it 3 times to understand it).</div><div>The possibility of sp=
eeding up the tappet velocity is limited though : it is this problem that c=
am grinders encounter when they try to get very fast valve opening. It's co=
mmon agreed that very fast valve opening (steep flank) with less overlap is=
 an advantage, but there are limits.</div><div>Marcel</div><div><br></div><=
hr id=3D"zwchr" data-marker=3D"__DIVIDER__"><div data-marker=3D"__HEADERS__=
"><b>Van: </b>"Richard Good" &lt;goodparts@verizon.net&gt;<br><b>Aan: </b>"=
van mulders marcel" &lt;van.mulders.marcel@telenet.be&gt;<br><b>Cc: </b>"fo=
t" &lt;fot@autox.team.net&gt;<br><b>Verzonden: </b>Dinsdag 18 februari 2020=
 06:02:23<br><b>Onderwerp: </b>Re: [Fot] Camshaft recommendation<br></div><=
div><br></div><div data-marker=3D"__QUOTED_TEXT__"><p dir=3D"ltr">Marcel,</=
p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">If you were to reduce the tappet velocity of the lower lift =
cam by 13% as well as reducing the cam lift then there would be no point.&n=
bsp; But if you grind the lower lift cam with the same lifter velocity as t=
he high lift cam then the high ratio rockers will give you 13% higher valve=
 speed than the high lift cam with stock rockers.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Richard</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Sent from AOL Mobile Mail <br>
Get the new AOL app: mail.mobile.aol.com<br><br></p>
<div class=3D"device_aol_et_org_dt_dd_quote"></div><hr style=3D"border:0;he=
ight:1px;color:#999;background-color:#999;width:100%;margin:0 0 9px 0;paddi=
ng:0"><span style=3D"font-size:14px;color:#999999">On Wednesday, February 1=
2, 2020 van.mulders.marcel &lt;<span style=3D"color:#0000a0">van.mulders.ma=
rcel@telenet.be</span>&gt; wrote:</span><br><div id=3D"yiv0854756989"></div=
><div><div style=3D"font-family:'verdana' , 'arial' , 'helvetica' , sans-se=
rif;font-size:10pt;color:#000000"><div><br clear=3D"none"></div><div>Richar=
d,</div><div>dare I answer again...</div><div>You say :" first decide what =
will be the optimum lift for your engine , then... ": in that case : what i=
s the point of high ratio rocker arms, if you want to end at the same maxim=
um valve lift? With a higher lobe x lower rocker ratio, the valve opening s=
peed will be the same and you have a lower force (load) at the pushrods and=
 lobe/cam followers. I think the only reason for a higher rocker ratio is t=
he camfollowers having a too small a diameter to be able to get at the maxi=
mum valve lift you want?</div><div>Marcel</div><hr id=3D"yiv0854756989zwchr=
"><div class=3D"yiv0854756989yqt1550548151" id=3D"yiv0854756989yqt35507"><d=
iv><b>Van: </b>"Richard Good" &lt;goodparts@verizon.net&gt;<br clear=3D"non=
e"><b>Aan: </b>"van mulders marcel" &lt;van.mulders.marcel@telenet.be&gt;<b=
r clear=3D"none"><b>Cc: </b>"fot" &lt;fot@autox.team.net&gt;<br clear=3D"no=
ne"><b>Verzonden: </b>Woensdag 12 februari 2020 17:25:10<br clear=3D"none">=
<b>Onderwerp: </b>Re: [Fot] Camshaft recommendation<br clear=3D"none"></div=
><div><br clear=3D"none"></div><div><p dir=3D"ltr">Marcel,</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Yes, if you increase rocker ratio and do not change the cam =
lift, the maximum lift will also increase by 13%.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Richard</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Sent from AOL Mobile Mail <br clear=3D"none">
Get the new AOL app: mail.mobile.aol.com</p>
<div class=3D"yiv0854756989device_aol_et_org_dt_dd_quote"></div><hr style=
=3D"border:0;min-height:1px;color:#999;background-color:#999;width:100%;mar=
gin:0 0 9px 0;padding:0"><span style=3D"font-size:14px;color:#999999">On We=
dnesday, February 12, 2020 van.mulders.marcel &lt;<span style=3D"color:#000=
0a0">van.mulders.marcel@telenet.be</span>&gt; wrote:</span><br clear=3D"non=
e"><div id=3D"yiv0854756989"></div><div><div style=3D"font-family:'verdana'=
 , 'arial' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:10pt;color:#000000"><div>Ri=
chard,&nbsp;</div><div>dare I answer this...</div><div>Do you mean that, wi=
th the higher rocker ratio, the valve is moving faster in the first part of=
 the opening phase and hence moving slower nearing the maximum lift? Suppos=
e the cam lift of both camshafts is such that the maximum lift is 13mm for =
both the 1.65 and 1.50 ratio and duration at 0.050" is 240=C2=B0, thus the =
crank has to move 120=C2=B0 to go from 0.050" lift to maximum lift in both =
cases. If the valve is opening 13% faster all the way from 0.050" lift unti=
ll maximum lift, the maximum lift will also be 13% higher! When an engine i=
s at, say 5000rpm or any other speed, it takes the same time to move 120=C2=
=B0 (from 0.050" to maximum lift) : the rocker arm ratio does not change th=
at and the valve that is opening 13% faster with the 1.65 ratio will end at=
 a maximum lift that is also 13% higher.&nbsp;</div><div>Marcel</div><hr id=
=3D"yiv0854756989zwchr"><div><b>Van: </b>"Richard Good" &lt;goodparts@veriz=
on.net&gt;)<br clear=3D"none"><b>Aan: </b>"Michael Zbarsky" &lt;mzbarsky@ya=
hoo.com&gt;, gkbyrne@optusnet.com.au, "van mulders marcel" &lt;van.mulders.=
marcel@telenet.be&gt;<div class=3D"yiv0854756989yqt0090589858" id=3D"yiv085=
4756989yqtfd74605"><br clear=3D"none"><b>Cc: </b>"fot" &lt;fot@autox.team.n=
et&gt;<br clear=3D"none"><b>Verzonden: </b>Woensdag 12 februari 2020 02:23:=
07<br clear=3D"none"><b>Onderwerp: </b>Re: [Fot] Camshaft recommendation<br=
 clear=3D"none"></div></div><div class=3D"yiv0854756989yqt0090589858" id=3D=
"yiv0854756989yqtfd30775"><div>&nbsp;7.887</div><div><p dir=3D"ltr">Michael=
,</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">People often seem to overlook the main performance benefit o=
f increasing the rocker ratio.&nbsp; That is the increase in valve velocity=
.&nbsp; The velocity of a flat tappet is limited by it's diameter. If you g=
rind the cam lobe for too much velocity the contact patch will move out pas=
t the edge of the lifter and things will self destruct.&nbsp; So tappet vel=
ocity is limited.&nbsp; However, since tappet velocity times rocker ratio e=
quals valve velocity, increasing the rocker ratio will increase valve veloc=
ity.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">First decide what will be the optimum valve lift for your en=
gine then divide by rocker ratio to determine the net cam lift needed to ac=
hieve that valve lift.&nbsp; Yes, you can grind the cam with a large enough=
 lobe to reach desired lift using stock rockers but you are limited in how =
fast you can open the valve.&nbsp; Now if you grind the cam with less lift =
then use 1.65:1 rockers to reach that same desired valve lift you will be m=
oving the valve about 13% faster. That means it will be open further in a g=
iven period of time.&nbsp; Graph it out and you will see a big difference.&=
nbsp; Valve velocity is a huge factor in performance.&nbsp; </p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">I can understand why someone who has tried to use high ratio=
 rockers with a cam that was already maxing out the valve lift with stock r=
ockers would decide that high ratio does not work.&nbsp; Valve lift was alr=
eady at max. Increasing it further may be a detriment.&nbsp; If duration wa=
s also maxed out for reasonable torque then the increase in lift during the=
 overlap period caused by the increase in rocker ratio may reduce the low e=
nd torque.&nbsp; Properly applied with the right cam profile, high ratio ro=
ckers enable performance that is just not achievable with stock rockers.</p=
>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Richard Good<br clear=3D"none">
Good Parts Inc</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Sent from AOL Mobile Mail <br clear=3D"none">
Get the new AOL app: mail.mobile.aol.com</p>
<div class=3D"yiv0854756989device_aol_et_org_dt_dd_quote"></div><hr style=
=3D"border:0;min-height:1px;color:#999;background-color:#999;width:100%;mar=
gin:0 0 9px 0;padding:0"><span style=3D"font-size:14px;color:#999999">On Tu=
esday, February 11, 2020 Michael Zbarsky via Fot &lt;<span style=3D"color:#=
0000a0">mzbarsky@yahoo.com</span>&gt; wrote:</span><br clear=3D"none"><div =
id=3D"yiv0854756989"></div><div>
Thanks everyone! Good stuff. I=E2=80=99m sticking to a redline of just over=
&nbsp;6K. I=E2=80=99d also like to keep the 1.65 setup rather than invest i=
n a 1.55 so keep the intel and&nbsp;suggestions coming. The GP3 is a defini=
te contender.&nbsp;<div><br clear=3D"none"></div><div>Mike&nbsp;<br clear=
=3D"none"><br clear=3D"none"><br clear=3D"none"><br clear=3D"none"><div cla=
ss=3D"yiv0854756989yqt2182859488" id=3D"yiv0854756989yqt21880"><p class=3D"=
yiv0854756989yahoo-quoted-begin" style=3D"font-size:15px;color:#715ffa;padd=
ing-top:15px;margin-top:0">On Monday, February 10, 2020, 4:07 PM, Geoff Byr=
ne &lt;gkbyrne@optusnet.com.au&gt; wrote:</p><blockquote class=3D"yiv085475=
6989iosymail"><div id=3D"yiv0854756989"><div>Ditch the 1.65 rockers no good=
 for racing<div>Geoff Byrne</div><div>TR6 racer down under<br clear=3D"none=
"><br clear=3D"none"><div dir=3D"ltr">Sent from my iPhone</div><div dir=3D"=
ltr"><br clear=3D"none"><blockquote>On 11 Feb 2020, at 12:52 am, van.mulder=
s.marcel--- via Fot &lt;fot@autox.team.net&gt; wrote:<br clear=3D"none"><br=
 clear=3D"none"></blockquote></div><blockquote><div dir=3D"ltr"><div style=
=3D"font-family:'verdana' , 'arial' , 'helvetica' , sans-serif;font-size:10=
pt;color:#000000"><div>I also once bought a Goodparts 1.65 rocker roller as=
sembly for a TR6 engine, but in the end I had to use a 1.55 roller rocker a=
ssembly, also from Goodparts, because, with the 1.65, it is difficult to fi=
nd a race camshaft with a&nbsp; lobe lift that is low enough. With lobes of=
 8mm or higher, I could not find valve springs to cope with the high valve =
lift. I bought a G5 camshaft from Schneider, they call it&nbsp; the 320-F g=
rind (duration is 268=C2=B0 at 0.050", timing is 57-83&nbsp; &nbsp; 87-53 ,=
 installation figure is then 103=C2=B0 :is that the same as the G5 grind?) =
with 0.340"/8.6mm cam lift and that makes for a&nbsp; valve lift of 12.9mm =
with the 1.55 rocker arms. With 1.65 rockers , valve lift would be 14.2mm a=
nd I could not find valve springs for that lift. The valve springs I used a=
re part no 281003-063.20 from Summit (Isky), 320lb/inch spring rate. They r=
ecommend 0.45"/11.43mm&nbsp; (1.250" - 0.800"from closed to full open posit=
ion, so it is about 1.4mm more in my engine, but there is no problem concer=
ning&nbsp; coil binding : the installed height is a 1mm more than 1.250 , t=
he pressure in closed position is lower&nbsp; of course, but still 34kgs (1=
05kgs at full lift) an that seems to be enough till 7500 rpm</div><div>Race=
torations have a race cam with 7.6mm cam lift, probably that would work wit=
h 1.65 rocker arms. I still have the 1.65 rocker assembly, it is new and it=
 could work with a road cam or any camshaft with a maximum of 8mm cam lift.=
</div><div>Marcel</div><div><br clear=3D"none"></div><hr id=3D"yiv085475698=
9zwchr"><div><b>Van: </b>"fot" &lt;fot@autox.team.net&gt;<br clear=3D"none"=
><b>Aan: </b>"fot" &lt;fot@autox.team.net&gt;<br clear=3D"none"><b>Verzonde=
n: </b>Maandag 10 februari 2020 02:34:27<br clear=3D"none"><b>Onderwerp: </=
b>[Fot] Camshaft recommendation<br clear=3D"none"></div><div><br clear=3D"n=
one"></div><div>
Hi all, I=E2=80=99m building a TR6 race engine and have a set of 1.65 ratio=
 roller rockers from Goodparts. Any recommendations for a suitable camshaft=
? I will be putting in cam bearings.&nbsp;<div><br clear=3D"none"><div>Than=
ks, Mike<br clear=3D"none"><br clear=3D"none"><br clear=3D"none"></div></di=
v>
<br clear=3D"none">_______________________________________________<br clear=
=3D"none">fot@autox.team.net<br clear=3D"none"><br clear=3D"none">http://ww=
w.fot-racing.com<br clear=3D"none"><br clear=3D"none">Donate: http://www.te=
am.net/donate.html<br clear=3D"none">Archive: http://autox.team.net/archive=
 http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot<br clear=3D"none">Unsubscribe/Manage: ht=
tp://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/van.mulders.marcel@telenet.be<div c=
lass=3D"yiv0854756989yqt5723059911" id=3D"yiv0854756989yqtfd51209"><br clea=
r=3D"none"></div></div></div><div class=3D"yiv0854756989yqt5723059911" id=
=3D"yiv0854756989yqtfd38997">______________________________________________=
_<br clear=3D"none">fot@autox.team.net<br clear=3D"none"><br clear=3D"none"=
>http://www.fot-racing.com<br clear=3D"none"><br clear=3D"none">Donate: htt=
p://www.team.net/donate.html<br clear=3D"none">Archive: http://autox.team.n=
et/archive http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot</div><br clear=3D"none">Unsubs=
cribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/gkbyrne@optushome.c=
om.au<div class=3D"yiv0854756989yqt5723059911" id=3D"yiv0854756989yqtfd7074=
9"><br clear=3D"none"><br clear=3D"none"><br clear=3D"none"></div></div></b=
lockquote></div></div></div><blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></div></d=
iv>
</div><div class=3D"yiv0854756989yqt2182859488" id=3D"yiv0854756989yqt54816=
"></div>_______________________________________________<br clear=3D"none"><=
a rel=3D"nofollow nofollow noopener noreferrer" shape=3D"rect" href=3D"mail=
to:fot@autox.team.net" target=3D"_blank">fot@autox.team.net</a><br clear=3D=
"none"><br clear=3D"none"><a rel=3D"nofollow nofollow noopener noreferrer" =
shape=3D"rect" href=3D"http://www.fot-racing.com"; target=3D"_blank">http://=
www.fot-racing.com</a><br clear=3D"none"><br clear=3D"none">Donate: <a rel=
=3D"nofollow nofollow noopener noreferrer" shape=3D"rect" href=3D"http://ww=
w.team.net/donate.html" target=3D"_blank">http://www.team.net/donate.html</=
a><br clear=3D"none">Archive: <a rel=3D"nofollow nofollow noopener noreferr=
er" shape=3D"rect" href=3D"http://autox.team.net/archive"; target=3D"_blank"=
>http://autox.team.net/archive </a><a rel=3D"nofollow nofollow noopener nor=
eferrer" shape=3D"rect" href=3D"http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot"; target=
=3D"_blank">http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot</a><br clear=3D"none">Unsubsc=
ribe/Manage: <a rel=3D"nofollow nofollow noopener noreferrer" shape=3D"rect=
" href=3D"http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/goodparts@verizon.net"; =
target=3D"_blank">http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/goodparts@veriz=
on.net</a><br clear=3D"none"><br clear=3D"none"><br clear=3D"none"><br clea=
r=3D"none"></div></div></div></div><br clear=3D"none"></div></div></div></d=
iv><br></div></div></body></html>
--=_0e5e4368-283e-4567-88ce-c9ed095f3a39--

--===============7501334490138290676==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
fot@autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Archive: http://autox.team.net/archive http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot



--===============7501334490138290676==--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>