fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fot] Camshaft recommendation

To: Enquiries Road & Track <enquiries@roadandtrack.net.au>
Subject: Re: [Fot] Camshaft recommendation
From: Larry Young via Fot <fot@autox.team.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 10:17:18 -0600
Authentication-results: cox.net; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=cartravel@cox.net a=CuBuoo8dK5YsICksPnTB2Q==:117 a=CuBuoo8dK5YsICksPnTB2Q==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=zOoktvdPAAAA:8 a=Ji5MhvttAAAA:8 a=JcvzPq48AAAA:8 a=6Lih0vMlAAAA:8 a=7Pb2DU7DEVhTXR_9mmoA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=SKAyjVdySzsA:10 a=m3MdUl94G8cA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=rEVzS3EKi221sh3eQYcA:9 a=itimsYA7dR29VT2k:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=GGGinmgZRQXmVEG1E52S:22 a=uylYf3CiyQbeni7AKCVt:22 a=583lFiaoEu_1o58ccHmG:22 a=UBcX5l0htOJbOgeJg7m8:22
Cc: fot <fot@autox.team.net>
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: fot@autox.team.net
References: <1417642395.1418618.1581524710564.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1417642395.1418618.1581524710564@mail.yahoo.com> <1392309332.69004004.1581531598578.JavaMail.zimbra@telenet.be> <e27a821e-8782-06de-e8e3-a8965854cba1@pobox.com> <1443903099.102861658.1582246281397.JavaMail.zimbra@telenet.be> <ec084849-53e8-886b-3b21-8e1b358d4260@pobox.com> <CA+UW8b2GeLKbF+ndrY-U0p8Q1pv_LvpP=D-1oG5fuCpmTWL-Lg@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============0572638041600162803==
 boundary="------------CAFC5D6025C8E67763FA5372"
Content-Language: en-US

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------CAFC5D6025C8E67763FA5372
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

"it seems most of the better cam grinders these days have some very 
fancy software".  -  That has not been my experience for TR cams, maybe 
for SBC cams. - Larry

On 2/22/2020 3:28 AM, Enquiries Road & Track wrote:
> it seems most of the better cam grinders these days have some very 
> fancy software for examining the motion of the valve for any cam/valve 
> train being proposed. They can easily calculate the critical 
> acceleration and deceleration limits for any valve train mass and its 
> not hard to 'plot" the motion of the cam/valve lifter, even if they 
> did not create the actual cam being studied.   Ive done this on my 
> lathe with a data capture system,. Ive just finished a major exercise 
> with one cam maker on my Toyota 4AG race engine where I suspected 
> valve train harmonics were responsible for a broken cam (actually 
> snapped in 2 at peak rpm) . valve spring makers  like PAC in the USA 
> are known to have such software.
>
> it seems like many TR cam profiles were created in the ancient past, 
> possibly more by trial an error than serious maths. Thats not to say 
> they are wrong/bad, but rather there is a more modern alternative that 
> might have a place. Some cam makers may be using such approaches with 
> TR cams, but I suspect many are just churning out what they did 30 
> years ago. .
>
> Terry O'Beirne
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 2:14 AM Larry Young via Fot 
>
>     Yes, the down side to a smaller clearance is that the seat-to-seat
>     duration and valve overlap will increase causing a loss of the low
>     end. This page > http://tildentechnologies.com/Cams/Tip_Lash.html
>     shows a case where the duration would increase about 32 degrees to
>     about 4x86 = 344 degrees. I like to call this the "tuning fork
>     effect" it sets of all kinds of vibrations which can cause the
>     valve to jump off the lifter and bounce off the seat at closing.
>
>     I did not intend to imply most smack the lifter, just that many
>     do. This is a good reason to thoroughly measure your cam profile.
>     Most stuff on the web talks about valve springs as the only cure
>     for valve float issues.
>      - Larry
>
>     On 2/20/2020 6:51 PM, van.mulders.marcel@telenet.be
>>
>>     Larry, you say most camshafts smack the lifters hard. Will a
>>     smaller valve clearance relieve this a bit? Has it disadvantages
>>     to set the clearance smaller than recommended?(except that the
>>     valves will run hotter)
>>     Marcel
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     http://www.fot-racing.com
>
>     Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
>     Archive: http://autox.team.net/archive
>     http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot
>     Unsubscribe/Manage
>     <http://www.team.net/pipermail/fotUnsubscribe/Manage>:
>     http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/enquiries@roadandtrack.net.au
>
>


--------------CAFC5D6025C8E67763FA5372
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    "it seems most of the better cam grinders these days have some very
    fancy software".  -  That has not been my experience for TR cams,
    maybe for SBC cams. - Larry<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/22/2020 3:28 AM, Enquiries Road
      &amp; Track wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CA+UW8b2GeLKbF+ndrY-U0p8Q1pv_LvpP=D-1oG5fuCpmTWL-Lg@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">it seems most of the better cam grinders these days
        have some very fancy software for examining the motion of the
        valve for any cam/valve train being proposed. They can easily
        calculate the critical acceleration and deceleration limits for
        any valve train mass and its not hard to 'plot" the motion of
        the cam/valve lifter, even if they did not create the actual cam
        being studied.   Ive done this on my lathe with a data capture
        system,. Ive just finished a major exercise with one cam maker
        on my Toyota 4AG race engine where I suspected valve train
        harmonics were responsible for a broken cam (actually snapped in
        2 at peak rpm) . valve spring makers  like PAC in the USA are
        known to have such software.
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>it seems like many TR cam profiles were created in the
          ancient past, possibly more by trial an error than serious
          maths. Thats not to say they are wrong/bad, but rather there
          is a more modern alternative that might have a place. Some cam
          makers may be using such approaches with TR cams, but I
          suspect many are just churning out what they did 30 years ago.
          .  <br>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div dir="ltr" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
                <div dir="ltr">
                  <div>
                    <div dir="ltr">
                      <div>
                        <div dir="ltr">
                          <div>
                            <div dir="ltr">
                              <div>
                                <div dir="ltr">
                                  <div>
                                    <div dir="ltr">
                                      <div>Terry O'Beirne</div>
                                    </div>
                                  </div>
                                </div>
                              </div>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
            <br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 2:14
          AM Larry Young via Fot &lt;<a href="mailto:fot@autox.team.net";
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">fot@autox.team.net</a>&gt;
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
          0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
          <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> Yes, the down side to a smaller
            clearance is that the seat-to-seat duration and valve
            overlap will increase causing a loss of the low end. This
            page &gt; <a
              href="http://tildentechnologies.com/Cams/Tip_Lash.html";
              target="_blank" 
moz-do-not-send="true">http://tildentechnologies.com/Cams/Tip_Lash.html</a>
            shows a case where the duration would increase about 32
            degrees to about 4x86 = 344 degrees. I like to call this the
            "tuning fork effect" it sets of all kinds of vibrations
            which can cause the valve to jump off the lifter and bounce
            off the seat at closing. <br>
            <br>
            I did not intend to imply most smack the lifter, just that
            many do. This is a good reason to thoroughly measure your
            cam profile. Most stuff on the web talks about valve springs
            as the only cure for valve float issues.<br>
             - Larry<br>
            <br>
            <div>On 2/20/2020 6:51 PM, <a
                href="mailto:van.mulders.marcel@telenet.be";
                target="_blank" 
moz-do-not-send="true">van.mulders.marcel@telenet.be</a>
              wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <div
style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>Larry, you say most camshafts smack the lifters
                  hard. Will a smaller valve clearance relieve this a
                  bit? Has it disadvantages to set the clearance smaller
                  than recommended?(except that the valves will run
                  hotter)</div>
                <div>Marcel<br>
                </div>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
          </div>
          _______________________________________________<br>
          <a href="mailto:fot@autox.team.net"; target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true">fot@autox.team.net</a><br>
          <br>
          <a href="http://www.fot-racing.com"; rel="noreferrer"
            target="_blank" 
moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.fot-racing.com</a><br>
          <br>
          Donate: <a href="http://www.team.net/donate.html";
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" 
moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.team.net/donate.html</a><br>
          Archive: <a href="http://autox.team.net/archive";
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" 
moz-do-not-send="true">http://autox.team.net/archive</a>
          <a href="http://www.team.net/pipermail/fotUnsubscribe/Manage";
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" 
moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot<br>
            Unsubscribe/Manage</a>: <a
href="http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/enquiries@roadandtrack.net.au";
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" 
moz-do-not-send="true">http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/enquiries@roadandtrack.net.au</a><br>
          <br>
          <br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>

--------------CAFC5D6025C8E67763FA5372--

--===============0572638041600162803==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
fot@autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Archive: http://autox.team.net/archive http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot



--===============0572638041600162803==--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>