healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Ethanol and Healeys

To: <GSFuqua1@aol.com>, "'Healey List'" <healeys@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: Ethanol and Healeys
From: "David Porter" <frogeye@swcp.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 07:13:17 -0600
Gary,
 Given the choice I'd pick ethanol every time given the ecological damage
attributable to MTBE.
 We even have a choice of not using ethanol in the winter here if one
doesn't mind driving to one of the gas stations run by the local native
American's who are not required by "our" laws to enhance the fuel. Though
I'm pretty sure that the average Joe doesn't know that little tid bit.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-healeys@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-healeys@autox.team.net] On
Behalf Of GSFuqua1@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 9:57 PM
To: N5572B@aol.com; healey.nut@gmail.com; gilrockwell@comcast.net
Cc: healeys@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Ethanol and Healeys

David is correct.  I used to make MTBE (Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether) and
have 
competed against Ethanol.  The Corn & Farm Lobbies are VERY powerful 
machines.  Especially when they have the "Green" Lobby support.  They won
which is one 
of the reasons MTBE is going away.  There is actually a better product than 
either Ethanol or MTBE.  It is ETBE but little was done to push for it as it

was a form of combined Ethanol and MTBE.  i.e. Neither group would be a
clear 
winner.  

For those of you who may care, Ethanol is made chiefly from corn.  However
it 
takes many times the amount of energy to make it versus what it does in the 
gasoline and for the atmosphere.  The big thing is that Corn is renewable.  
MTBE is made from a chemical process that uses Natural Gas, Oxygen to create

Methanol which is then combined with Isobutlyene. (a refined liquid
byproduct of 
Natural Gas).  Both are hard on Rubber and seals.  Ethanol is particularly
bad 
about water and particulate matter.  It will literally "Clean" your system.

It will also burn a hotter so what your temp gauge.

What makes me the most unhappy is that Ethanol is also highly subsidized by 
tax dollars.  Why?  Because it is not competitive to manufacture.  Remember
the 
earlier statement about the amount of energy it takes to make it?

I realize the last paragraph and perhaps the entire response could be 
considered "Political" and it is NOT my desire or intent to see this debated
on the 
list.  So please hold the flames.  I just thought there might be a few who 
would like to know the background.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>