Like I was saying... It's not simple mathematics at all.
Wilko
On Feb 4, 2009, at 12:43 PM, Bob Spidell wrote:
> This got me to thinking (always a dangerous proposition) ...
>
> Aren't we forgetting about the Law of Conservation of Energy?
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energy). If I read
> the law correctly (I'm not a lawyer) if it takes X HP to drive the
> water/air through/over the engine you'll use X HP from a) the
> engine, for a mechanical pump or fan or b) the alternator for an
> electric pump/fan. Assuming little or no slippage from the belt,
> the engine-driven pump/fan will be operating at near 100%
> efficiency (minus the fluid 'slippage' at the fan blade or pump
> impeller--essentially the same for both electrical or engine-driven
> units). I don't know the actual number, but alternators are
> probably around 80-90% efficient at converting mechanical energy to
> electrical (by rectifying the AC output to DC you're losing some of
> the electrical power, and some goes up as heat and there's always
> friction).
>
> IOW, if you convert X HP to watts, you'll increase the load on the
> alternator by (X HP->Y Watts), and the alternator will produce the
> additional watts by converting more engine HP to electricity.
>
> The advantage of electrically-driven accessories--it seems to me--
> is the ability to reduce or shut off the motor power when not
> needed. Yes, you can run them off the battery, but usually you'll
> be running off the alternator.
>
>
> Bob
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
http://www.team.net/archive
|