healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Healeys] 100 Starter Motor

To: "'Oudesluys'" <coudesluijs@chello.nl>, "'Thomas Willig'" <twillig@ruda.de>
Subject: Re: [Healeys] 100 Starter Motor
From: "John Sims" <ahbn6@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:04:38 -0400
Or another common missing piece is the engine ground strap.

John Sims, BN6
Aberdeen, NJ
 
http://www.healey6.com


-----Original Message-----
From: healeys-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:healeys-bounces@autox.team.net]
On Behalf Of Oudesluys
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 10:00 AM
To: Thomas Willig
Cc: Healeys@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Healeys] 100 Starter Motor

Thomas,
Unless you have a very high compression (modified) engine there should
be no need at all for a stronger starter motor. The same motor can crank
an E-type Jaguar.
If it cranks to slow something is amiss (brushes, contacts, solenoid,
battery terminals etc.).
The gear reduction starter motors are in fact much better as they
consume a lot less current and thus can save the battery in the long run.
Kees Oudesluijs


Thomas Willig schreef:
> Hi Curt,
>
> many thanks for this info. Does the list give more technical details of
> the starter ...like hp? I wonder if Lucas had a starter which had more
> power than 25521B. Many owners convert to the modern gear-reduction
> starters, which sounds terrible to me, because they do not trust the
> limited output of the 100 starter. Maybe there is a starter in the list
> which would look original, while having more cranking power.
>
> Regards
>
>
> Thomas Willig
> _______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Healeys@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation  $12.75
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>