mg-mmm
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Compression Ratio

To: Pat Mullen <pmullen@telus.net>, "Kelly, Brian" <kellmg@aol.com>
Subject: Re: Compression Ratio
From: "J.E.A.Rich" <mmmbob@adelphia.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 19:21:56 -0700
Cc: <mg-mmm@autox.team.net>
In-reply-to: <3E7243A9.3899DE03@telus.net>
Reply-to: "J.E.A.Rich" <mmmbob@adelphia.net>
Sender: owner-mg-mmm@autox.team.net
User-agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022
Pat, Brian et al,

You're right Pat, I would definitely agree with the thought of using a
blower, especially on a PA if it has the original Wolseley gearbox with its
rather poor gear ratios.

Cheers, "Bob".

P.S. Pat, how are you coming with the N Type head?


> From: Pat Mullen <pmullen@telus.net>
> Reply-To: Pat Mullen <pmullen@telus.net>
> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 13:03:37 -0800
> To: "Kelly, Brian" <kellmg@aol.com>
> Cc: mg-mmm@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: Compression Ratio
> 
> Hi Brian,
> 
> I emailed Mike Dowley on this subject a few weeks ago, regarding my N
> crank, -.030 on the big ends, -.020 on the mains. I told him I'd crack
> tested it.
> His reply:
> "Cyl.Head Reface to 3.19/32" to give 6.7:1 C.R (remove 3/64")
> 3.35/64" to give 7.2:1 C.R. (remove 3/32")
> Personally I would go for option 1 bearing in mind you have an almost
> 70 year old crankshaft - albeit uncracked."
> 
> Colin Campbell's analysis (my summary):
> The big end bearing load at tdc on the WORKING stroke increases with
> compression ratio much more rapidly than does the C.R. However the
> inertia load at tdc for the NON-WORKING stroke at higher rpm
> (4000+?) is much higher than the WORKING stroke bearing load at tdc for
> most engines with stroke/bore ratios of 1.25 and more. See Colin
> Campbell's "The Sports Car - Its Design & Performance", editions 2 or 3,
> about pp 84 & 98 respectively, not in edns 1 or 4).
> An MMM engine's S/B ratio is between 1.25 or 1.46.
> Therefore, the increased stress on our engines due to increased CR may
> not be as critical as might be supposed at first thought.
> 
> As long as you have good exhaust valve inserts, Bill Putnam's suggestion
> of a blower seems the way to go.
> (Bob Rich, I'm sure you agree).
> 
> Cheers ... Pat
> 
> Bill Putnam wrote:
>> 
>> At Monday, 10 March 2003, you wrote:
>> 
>>> MMMers,
>>> 
>>> What are the restrictions on increasing the compression ratio on
>> MMM engines.
>> ...
>>> All comments and advise appreciated.
>>> 
>>> Brian Kelly.
>> 
>> If you're looking for more power, I would suggest a blower as a more
>> effective route.  Less stress on the engine per added bhp vs. CR
>> increase.  Also, you'd need quite a bit of an increase in CR to give
>> the powerband that even 5 psi boost will do.
>> 
>> Bill Putnam, who, once he drove a MMM with a blower, became entirely
>> addicted to them!
>> 
>> ///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
>> ///  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
>> ///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
>> ///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/mg-mmm
>> ///  Send list postings to mg-mmm@autox.team.net
> 
> ///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
> ///  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
> ///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
> ///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/mg-mmm
> ///  Send list postings to mg-mmm@autox.team.net

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/mg-mmm
///  Send list postings to mg-mmm@autox.team.net


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>