mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

The Upholstery Question

To: british-cars@autox.team.net
Subject: The Upholstery Question
From: mmcewen@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca (Mere)
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 1997 15:27:47 -0500
Yes, I'm back from Sin City and I loved it.  Talk about a work in progress!
I have been following various threads since my return and would like to
address the question of upholstery.  Several of you have been arguing for
or against vinyl vs. leather.  Cost aside leather is nice, smells best,
wears well and is easier on the tush than vinyl - especially in extreme
weather, hot or cold.  However, vinyl is cheaper, wears better than leather
and can be patterned in more interesting ways.  It is far less subject to
aging cracks, and with minimun care will last a very long time - providing
it is not exposed to extremes of temperature, especially heat.

I have found a third type of uphostery which alas does not belong in LBCs.
During the late 70s and 80s, GM and other American cars used - gasp! -
short-nap velour upholstery.  I have these interiors in several of my cars
- especially my daily drivers - and I love it.  My wife's 1981 P*nti*c has
200,000 km on it and the seats look like new.  The entire interior looks as
though it is new.  The car is never garaged.  The seats are cool in summer
and warm in winter.  My 78 Cad Eldo has similar material and the seats are
nearly as nice.  Minute wear, no rips or separations.  The puffed vinyl on
the doors and armrests has deteriorated from cold weather as it breaks when
touched at minus 25 C.

What does this all mean for LBC lovers?  Simple.  If you want authenticity,
smell and the appearance of luxury, buy leather.  If you want authenticity,
practicality and low cost, buy vinyl - but don't leave it parked in the sun
with the top down if you're wearing shorts.  If you want comfort and
durability buy velour.  The seats will still look good in 20 years - but
don't leave the top down in the rain.

John McEwen



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>