mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: "Zero" Emission Autos

To: mgs@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: Re: "Zero" Emission Autos
From: nolan penney <npenney@concentric.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1997 08:50:43 -0800
>     Internal combustion engines are not the best things going.  Why
>do you think the Navy doesn't produce any more diesel aircraft
>carriers?  Because nuclear fuel consumption is measured in grams per
>day, whereas diesel fuel consumption is in gallons per FOOT.

Say what?!  Scott, those carriers were never diesel powered, they were oil 
burner 
boilers.  The onboard diesels are auxiliary and emergency power generators, 
installed on both oil burner and nuke carriers.

>     Internal combustion engines are a century-old technology, and
>regardless of how much we can tweak it, we always need to be looking
>for better ways of getting the job done.

Batteries are *far* older then the internal combustion engine.

>  I personally think $30,000 for an electric commuter car is great, because it 
>fills a 
>valid need,and they will only get cheaper.  

There is no indication of them getting cheaper.  In fact, historically, they 
have gotten 
far more expensive.

>After all, how expensive were the first cars, compared to the price of a horse 
>and 
>carriage?

On par.  Breakdowns were a problem though.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>