mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: a few questions...

To: John Steczkowski <stecz@pswtech.com>
Subject: Re: a few questions...
From: "REICHLE, CHRISTOPHER" <CREICHLE@nsc.msmail.miami.edu>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 15:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
I use 185 70 r14 with no clearance problems. I think 195 with the same 
offset as the rostyle will do fine. There are people on the list with that 
setup. I used the stiffer uprated spring set for front and back which also 
lower the car and the ride was much stiffer. verry little roll around turns. 
If your exhaust is not mounted very close to the car you will have to be 
real carefull going over speed bumps but do to the stiffer springs the car 
does not dip as much on the bounce so it's really not that bad. It looks 
better but I did it for the handling. When they raised the rubber bumper 
cars to meet fed regulations it raised the center of gravity and handling 
went down the tubes. The rear sway bar was added to compensate and the front 
was made thicker. The extra weight of the bumpers is a real drag too so 
getting them down another inch lower makes a huge difference in the turns. I 
think the stiffer springs have a lot to do with that too though. I also have 
the tube shock conversion which I am pleased with. I don't know if the 
original shocks will still align properly when you lower the car. The shock 
links may be the wrong length to opperate the shock without bottoming out. 
You may also need to get shorter bump stops to allow for further suspension 
travel at the new lower hight especially if you don't use uprated springs. I 
don't have them and haven't had a problem but I know people who have non 
uprated springs that lowered the car and hear a thump now and then. With 195 
on the car you could easilly go up to a 3/4 sway bar on the front. It's on 
the list for my B with 185s. On hard turns and heavy acceleration I lift and 
spin the back wheel on the inside of the turn. The 3/4 sway should limit 
that but it could also be the stock bump stop interferring with the roll of 
the back of the car in the turn causing it to lift the other side. The 
shorter bump stops are on the list when extra money comes around

Chris
creichle@nsc.msmail.miami.edu
 ----------
From: John Steczkowski
To: REICHLE, CHRISTOPHER
Cc: mgs
Subject: Re: a few questions...
Date: Monday, October 20, 1997 1:56PM

Does it work ok? Any clearance problems (I have 195/65/14s)?
ride/handling compromise ok? Looks improved enough for the trouble?


REICHLE, CHRISTOPHER wrote:

> Been there, done that, got the T-shirt. Ask and I shall answer with
> what I
> know...
>
> Chris Reichle
> creichle@nsc.msmail.miami.edu
>
> Question one:  I'm planning to lower my 1979 MGB Limited Edition (one
> of the
> 250 Canadian cars) by 1.5".  I have new springs and fresh shocks all
> round.
> Anyone been there, done that, and have suggestions?



 --
John Steczkowski
PSW Technologies, Inc.
512-343-6666
stecz@pswtech.com
http://www.pswtech.com/~stecz
http://www.pswtech.com                          O-



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>