Re: non od and OD trannys

To:	Robert Hill <oldcars@vallnet.com>
Subject:	Re: non od and OD trannys
From:	xyzabcde@earthlink.net
Date:	Tue, 22 Dec 1998 22:36:12 +0000

Dave Ambrose said:

> You say you have a B downstairs with back-up lights - is it a GT?

Um, no, both '67 B's I mentioned were convertibubbles.

> THe issue is not
> whether the B convertible had them but the GT in 67 !

Really?  There were no '67 BGT's with backup lights?  I find that hard to
believe.  Prove it. ;-)

Denise Thorpe

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: non od and OD trannys, (continued) Re: non od and OD trannys, BDurgin1 Re: non od and OD trannys, Dave Houser Re: non od and OD trannys, EricSsmc Re: non od and OD trannys, David Ambrose Re: non od and OD trannys, MSAWDEY RE: non od and OD trannys, Dan Dwelley Re: non od and OD trannys, Paul Tegler Re: non od and OD trannys, Paul Tegler Re: non od and OD trannys, xyzabcde Re: non od and OD trannys, Bob Howard Re: non od and OD trannys, xyzabcde <= Re: non od and OD trannys, Dave Houser Re: non od and OD trannys, Robert Hill Re: non od and OD trannys, MSAWDEY Re: non od and OD trannys, Mark Rayborn Re: non od and OD trannys, Paul Hunt Re: non od and OD trannys, Paul Hunt Re: non od and OD trannys, Dave Houser

Previous by Date:	Re: Definition of a Boat?, H4aardvrk
Next by Date:	Fuel Tank Obstruction, HUTCHINS, JOE
Previous by Thread:	Re: non od and OD trannys, Bob Howard
Next by Thread:	Re: non od and OD trannys, Dave Houser
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]