mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: 3 bearing vs. 5 bearing MGB?

To: Mark Davidson <mrdavidson@sympatico.ca>
Subject: RE: 3 bearing vs. 5 bearing MGB?
From: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 11:37:22 -0700
Mark:

        Both motors are dependable, neither is a "lemon".

        Each has strong points and weak points.  The 5 main was an
evolutionary change to suit a FWD application, not a fix for any problem.
IMHO don't let the type of motor sway you.  Find a good car that preferably
has the original drivetrain, and that has not been messed with too much.
63-67 MGBs had few foibles, so unless the PO really knew what they were
doing, you want to stay original.

Kelvin.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Davidson [mailto:mrdavidson@sympatico.ca]
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 11:40 AM
> To: MG List
> Subject: 3 bearing vs. 5 bearing MGB?
> 
> 
> I am looking at a '64 MGB with a 3 bearing motor.  I have, 
> however, just
> been asked by somebody in the local MG Club, "...why a 64?  
> Has the engine
> been replaced... the older 3 main was a lemon."
> 
> Can anybody share their views on the 3 bearing vs. 5 bearing 
> engine?  Any
> particular headaches with one over the other?  Anything I 
> should be careful
> to look for in the 3 bearing engine before I buy?
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark
> ..............................................................
> ...........
> Mark R. Davidson - Professional Web Development
> MRDavidson@sympatico.ca
> ICQ No. 29675858
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>