mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Braking distance-Reply

To: Paul Hunt <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>
Subject: Re: Braking distance-Reply
From: Elliott DeGraff <degraff@erols.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 16:03:12 -0500
In the Washinton DC area, if you stay 3 or four lengths behind the car
in front of you, three or four cars will pass you and fill the gap. 
Traffic abhors a vacuum.

Elliott DeGraff
2 71Bs

Paul Hunt wrote:
> 
> Aha, the 'ol three-second rule.  Maybe your tutor didn't think much of your
> reaction times :-)
> 
> 'Course, you also have to keep an eye on the vehicle and if they're too
> close you then have to use the four- or six-second rule ...
> 
> PaulH.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Scotty <scotty@dove.net.au>
> To: Florrie & Allen Bachelder <bachldrs@swva.net>; <mgs@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2000 11:27 AM
> Subject: Re: Braking distance-Reply
> 
> > Listers,
> >              to estimate a safe driving distance from the vehicle in front
> > of me I was tought to 'Mark' as the vehicle passed a point, a tree?
> corner?
> > fire plug or skid mark--whatever. Then to count 1000 and one-1000 and two-
> > 1000 and three, at which point I should be at the 'Mark' point or have not
> > reached it yet. This was a safe braking distance at any speed according to
> > the instructor, so far it has either worked, or, I have been lucky because
> > to date I have never rear ended another car, oops now I've been and done
> > it!!  I've been close but have stopped in time. On the other hand the
> hoons
> > seem to have enough distance between the car in front of mine and mine to
> > change lanes and pull in front of my car, you can't win 'em all, I guess.
> > 8^)
> >
> > L8R,
> >
> > Scotty,
> > Adelaide,Australia.
> >
> >
> >
> >

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>