He's full of it. Unless you've done something else, other than just
talking here, you are not violating Federal law (caveat: ianal). If you
wrote his bidder list, however, I'm not sure how appropriate that might
have been - it might be bettter to talk to the ebay people instead. If
he's just warning you not to talk to the bidder list, though, I think he's
on shaky ground.
At 03:54 PM 5/24/01 -0600, Bullwinkle wrote:
>Listers:
>
>Since I only got the copy addressed to me, I assume it didn't go
>through to the list so here it is.
>
>My questions are:
>
>1) How does one convert facts to opinions?
>
>2) Why is unsolisited information in the US mail, which I don't
>want, not classified as interfering in interstate commerce?
>
>3) What about warnings published in the newspaper by a State's
>attorney regarding fraud and deception by person(s) or businesses
>even though there has been no prosecutions?
>
>4) Why doesn't question 2 apply to the NET.
>
>mrbadger wrote:
> >
> > NOTICE: What is being suggested here violates a Federal law called
> > interference with interstate commerce. Any individual or group who
> > spams my bidder list with unsolicited opinions will be prosecuted to the
> > full extent. You may talk among yourselves all you wish and say
> > whatever you like but let's keep it at that, eh gents?
> > Thanks, Derek Durst
///
/// mgs@autox.team.net mailing list
/// (If they are dupes, this trailer may also catch them.)
|