mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Mgs] Their back!!

To: <Aeseeyou@aol.com>, <mgs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Mgs] Their back!!
From: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:36:47 +0100
Hardly, he couldn't have done it on his own or without the agreement of 
Nuffield.  MG was a properly constituted company in its own right separate 
to 'The Morris Garages', which was why MG always said "MG doesn't stand for 
Morris Garages, it stands for itself".  If the tax people had thought they 
were the same there would have been tax penalties.

----- Original Message ----- 
> But it wasn't until 1923 when he'd became so tired of playing  second
> fiddle to William Morris's Morris Motors that Cecil Kimber introduced a 
> car that
> he dropped the Morris name and adopted the sportier name MG for Morris
> Garages and the rest like they say is History.
_______________________________________________

Mgs@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation  $12.75
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>