rolls-bentley
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 1st Bentley

To: John.W.Rosevear@fmr.com, rolls-bentley@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: 1st Bentley
From: "Mark Wolk" <nzst@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 08:06:59 NZST
The early turbos are to be avoided, I think. They usually sell for less than 
the standard versions. If you have your car checked thoroughly by a RR 
qualified specialist, you should be safe. Insist on checking all the 
hydraulics. Maintenance will be probably cheaper than for the Aston Martin. 
Good luck!

Mark Wolk
New Zealand Splendeur Tours
100% pure luxury tours
http://nzst.co.nz


>From: "Rosevear, John W" <John.W.Rosevear@fmr.com>
>Reply-To: "Rosevear, John W" <John.W.Rosevear@fmr.com>
>To: "'rolls-bentley@autox.team.net'" <rolls-bentley@autox.team.net>
>Subject: 1st Bentley
>Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 14:30:11 -0400
>
>Greetings, all -
>
>Am considering the purchase of a first Bentley, to be used as a semi-daily
>driver and for general enjoyment.  I would love a Turbo R but am a bit
>daunted -- I'm problably more likely to end up with an '89ish Mulsanne or
>similar.  What should I expect in terms of problem areas and annual
>maintenance?  Assume I've bought a checked-out example with 50k miles or
>thereabouts.
>
>Forgive me if the above represents oft-covered territory; if there's a FAQ
>that would answer my questions I'd be grateful if someone would send me a
>link.
>
>Regards,
>John Rosevear
>Acton, MA, USA
>'77 Aston Martin V8 Vantage

________________________________________________________________________


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>