spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 3 rail to 1 rail

To: "Ray Bryant" <photoray@flash.net>, <spitfires@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: 3 rail to 1 rail
From: "N.A. Campiglia III" <spitdrvr@camalott.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 06:59:37 -0600
Ray,
I did the same change last spring.  There was no need to change the slave
cylinder, I used the original one and it works fantastic.

Dont you love this weather???

N.A. Campiglia
Abilene, TX
http://camalott.com/~spitdrvr
'74 Spitfire 1500
'67 Spitfire MK III
-----Original Message-----
From: Ray Bryant <photoray@flash.net>
To: spitfires@autox.team.net <spitfires@autox.team.net>
Date: Monday, March 01, 1999 11:04 PM
Subject: 3 rail to 1 rail


>Hey Y'all,
>I hate to brag, but the weather here in Texas has been incredible.  I was
>out today with the top down and wearing a t-shirt.  But this Saturday I am
>putting in a single rail gear box to replace my worn out 3 rail gear box.
>I'm getting a new clutch kit to match the new gear box, but I wasn't sure
>whether I should replace the slave cylinder.  I was told that there is no
>difference, but I just wanted to make sure.  Let me know if this is right
>or wrong.
>Thanks, Ray
>
>**********************************************************************
>Ray Bryant
>Keller, Texas
>'73 Spitfire 1500 (FM6879U), Daily driver
>Red River Triumph Club http://www.imagin.net/~hensley/rrtc.html
>Bryant Studios Photography http://www.flash.net/~photoray
>**********************************************************************
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>