spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Mustang...Spitfire???

To: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
Subject: Re: Mustang...Spitfire???
From: Andrew Mace <amace@unix2.nysed.gov>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 09:05:09 -0500 (EST)
On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Joe Curry wrote:

> Big question and food for thought:
> 
> Did Lee Iacoca in bringing out the Mustang take a lesson form the
> Spitfire?
> 
> Both cars were essentially reworked from existing sedans (saloons)
> already being produced by their respective companies....

Joe, I love the theory, but that sort of thing wasn't exactly new even in 
the 1960s. After all, in the mid-1950s, Ford basically shrunk a full-size 
Ford, plunked one of their larger V-8s in the engine bay, and called it 
Thunderbird. A couple years before, Chevrolet took their six-cylinder 
engine, added a couple extra carbs, kept the PowerGlide tranny, dropped 
it into more or less a '52 Chevy wagon chassis and molded some fiberglas 
around it -- yes, the mighty Wurlitzer, er, Corvette!

Of course, Austin (A40 and A40 Sports), MG (most of their sports cars
borrowing heavily from "saloon car" parts bins), Standard-Triumph
(remember where so many of the bits for the TR2 came from) and just about
everyone else has worked this way over the years. The relatively few more
"purpose-built" sports cars (such as Jaguars, Aston-Martins, Ferraris,
most Porsches, etc.) have the much higher price to reflect that build
philosophy. 

But it was still a pretty clever thing, that original Mustang of April 
1964. I'll take one!

--Andy

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Andrew Mace, President and                *
*   10/Herald/Vitesse (Sports 6) Consultant *
* Vintage Triumph Register <www.vtr.org>    *
* amace@unix2.nysed.gov                     *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>