spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Poor Compression

To: Michael Graziano <mgrazian@ltcm.com>
Subject: Re: Poor Compression
From: HFC <froggi@cdsnet.net>
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 14:45:24 -0700
Cc: Jeff Boatright <jboatri@emory.edu>, spridgets@autox.team.net
Organization: WFO Racing
References: <C1DBE75711D0D211B1DA00A0C9E0AF02050541@exch01.ltcm.com>
Reply-to: HFC <froggi@cdsnet.net>
Sender: owner-spridgets@autox.team.net
Mike,

Opening the throttle allows maximum air flow to the cylinder(s), otherwise your
reading is erroneous.  Try it both ways; there's a noticeable difference.

WFO Herb

Michael Graziano wrote:

> What's this?  Open Throttle?  I haven't done that.  Why would I have to apen
> the throttle?
>
> Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HFC [mailto:froggi@cdsnet.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 1999 2:34 PM
> To: Jeff Boatright
> Cc: spridgets@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: Poor Compression
>
> You are checking compression with the throttle opened fully, right!?!
>
> WFO Herb
>
> Jeff Boatright wrote:
>
> > Did you check with the engine hot? I've found that for accurate
> compression
> > check, I need to bring the engine up to running temp, shut down, and check
> > asap. Weare gloves to protect against burns. Also, how much do you trust
> > your gauge? At a recent AHCA tech session, I found that one gauge was
> > consistent, the other gave occassional oddball readings in comparison. The
> > inconsistency is what led me to chuck it.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > At 9:42 AM -0400 5/4/99, Michael Graziano wrote:
> > > So last night I had two options for things to do.  1.  Do my laundry as
> I
> > > had no more work clothes, or 2. Check my compression for no apparent
> reason.
> > >
> > > Of course I check the compression.  And now the results.
> > >
> > > Cyl 1:        130
> > > Cyl 2:        130
> > > Cyl 3:        110
> > > Cyl 4:        130
> > >
> > > So now I'm concerned about #3.  About 500 miles ago,  they were all
> around
> > > 125 to 130.  Now the 125 ones are @ 130 and a 130 cyl is at 110.  I put
> in
> > > 5cc's of 20W50 and redid the test on #3 with no change.  5 more cc's (10
> > > total) and the PSI jumped to 125 from 110.  During that 500 miles,  I've
> > > changed from SAE 40 to 20W50.  Could that have contribute towards the
> > > difference?
> > >
> > > Could I have botched the valve adjustment,  or is this simply a sign of
> worn
> > > rings?  If the latter,  is there anything I could do (other than not
> drive
> > > the car) that will prolong the problem.  Probably not.....
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > '78 Midget 1500 (Who performed quite well on the 150 mile trip to
> Britfest)
> > >
> > > PS:  I wound up doing the laundry too.....  Not as much fun, that's for
> > > sure.
> > >   _____________________________________
> > >
> >
> > Jeffrey H. Boatright, PhD
> > Senior Editor, Molecular Vision
> > http://www.molvis.org/molvis
> > Mailto:jboatri@emory.edu
> > 404-778-4113



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>