tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re[2]: NOS vs REPRO

To: RevSteveP@aol.com, Roland Dudley <cobra@cdc.hp.com>
Subject: Re[2]: NOS vs REPRO
From: LeBrun@hii.hitachi.com
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 96 13:46:58 PST
     Guess what;
     
     -I agree with all of you. 
     
     -Therefore, I can have the repro quoted both WITH & WITHOUT the logo. 
     Then people can have a choice, depending on demand. Not bad Mktng., 
     huh? I will publish my quotes on the net along with what my est. 
     selling price might be. 
     
     -Don't worry, I just need enough profits to keep my garage 
     refrigerator full of cold beer for the errant TIGER owner who shows 
     up.Like I said before, I ain't in it for the dough!
     
                           Phil


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: NOS vs REPRO
Author:  Roland Dudley <cobra@cdc.hp.com> at ~INTERNET
Date:    7/18/96 12:24 PM


>  Like an art work or a rare coin can be original. 
> 
> No Tiger has 1967 gas in it!
> No Tiger has 1967 oil in it, and none of you would want it! 
> No Tiger has 1967 oil filters or air filters in it!
> No Tiger has 1967 tires (tyres) on it.  (pity the poor soul who does!) 
> No Tiger has 1967 wiper blades on it.
> Very few Tigers have original rubber, if they do there is little left of it
> Very few Tigers have original soft tops, hard told liners, tonneaus, seats or 
> carpets.  (And those of us who do want to replace them as soon as our wives
> 
> Steve
     
While I don't necessarily want to come down on Frank's side here, I'm 
wondering if is it reasonable to be comparing perishables like gasoline, 
oil, tires or even rubber parts to a "non perishable" item like an air 
cleaner or a rare coin?  I don't think Frank would even argue that only 
a period OEM air filters should be used inside the air cleaner unless it 
is clearly marked non original.
     
Roland


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>