At 5:56 PM -0400 8/30/1999, James Barrett wrote:
>Folks,
> I hate to say this, but my left leg & back just quit.
>In my Tiger II I have a 4 speed transmission and a new
>Long clutch. It is easy to push in, but my left leg
>no longer works correctly. Therefore, I either have to
>switch to an automatic transmission or get rid of my
>Tiger II with the 351C 4 barrel motor in it.
>
> My question are:
> Has anyone put a C6 automatic in a Tiger?
>
>How does the C6 length compare to the original Top Loader
>for a Tiger II?
>
>Does the transmission tunnel have to be enlarged?
>
>Any one want a 1967 351C Tiger II for $18,000?
JIm: The C6 is to big. The C4 is a near bolt in- Rootes actually built a
couple of automatics late in the Tigers life. There's a old CAT article on
swapping the C4 into a Tiger- the drive shaft goes back in with the help
of a spacer. If you're serious about this, I can dig out the article and
scan it for you.
|