Chris Thompson wrote:
> As has been well documented, back in the 60's and before, cars were generally
>titled in the year they were purchased, not by model year, so that probably
>explains your '67 1a. I wouldn't worry about it. It certainly won't effect
>the value or TAC-ability of the car. And obviously, regardless of the title,
>it's still a 1a...
>
> Chris Thompson
Very good reply, Chris, a great deal shorter than my 'history chapter'. On the
other hand, I believe that a 'Mk 1A' is an American invention, not a British
one. There have been rolling changes to the Tiger, per Norman's 'transition
Tigers' story, that illustrate the continuing changes, regardless of date.
Only the Mk II, with
it's change in engine, was officially recognized as a model change.
Anyway, that's the way I understand it.
Steve
--
Steve Laifman < Find out what is most >
B9472289 < important in your life >
< and don't let it get away!>
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
_/_/_/_/_/__/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
_/
_/_/_/
|