tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Title Question

To: "'Steve Laifman'" <laifman@flash.net>
Subject: RE: Title Question
From: Chris Thompson <cthompson@rrinc.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 18:37:03 -0500
You are, of course, correct about there not really being a Mark 1a.  I think 
this is a tradition that started post 1967, even....

Regardless, it's now known as a 1a...

However, I recall a further complication on this issue, that may be at odds 
with your history.  The feller who used to sell Rootes in my neck of the woods 
says that he would get papers with the cars that would list the model year.  If 
they still had inventory at the beginning of the next year, he would send back 
to England, and they would happily oblige him with new papers for his 
inventory, updating the model year to the current year.  This was, of course, 
because nobody wants to buy a new car that is a year old.  I think he said that 
all the British manufacturers (he sold MG, Triumph, and Austin-Heally at least) 
would be happy to oblige....

Chris Thompson
Executive Vice President
Recognition Research, Inc.
1750 Kraft Dr. Suite 2000
Blacksburg, VA 24060
540.961.6500
540.961.3568/fax
cthompson@rrinc.com
www.rrinc.com
B382000331

-----Original Message-----
From:   Steve Laifman [SMTP:laifman@flash.net]
Sent:   Thursday, November 04, 1999 2:24 PM
To:     Chris Thompson
Cc:     'Kent Baker'; tigers@autox.team.net
Subject:        Re: Title Question

Chris Thompson wrote:

> As has been well documented, back in the 60's and before, cars were generally 
>titled in the year they were purchased, not by model year, so that probably 
>explains your '67 1a.  I wouldn't worry about it.  It certainly won't effect 
>the value or TAC-ability of the car.  And obviously, regardless of the title, 
>it's still a 1a...
>
> Chris Thompson

Very good reply, Chris, a great deal shorter than my 'history chapter'.  On the 
other hand, I believe that a 'Mk 1A' is an American invention, not a British 
one.  There have been rolling changes to the Tiger, per Norman's 'transition 
Tigers' story, that illustrate the continuing changes, regardless of date.  
Only the Mk II, with
it's change in engine, was officially recognized as a model change.

Anyway, that's the way I understand it.

Steve

--
Steve Laifman         < Find out what is most     >
B9472289              < important in your life    >
                      < and don't let it get away!>

_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
     _/                 _/_/_/       _/_/_/       _/
    _/        _/      _/     _/     _/    _/     _/_/_/_/
   _/        _/       _/    _/      _/  _/      _/
  _/_/_/_/_/__/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
                            _/
                     _/_/_/



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>