tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

[Fwd: GM vs MICROSOFT ha ha what a match]

To: "tigers@autox.team.net" <tigers@autox.team.net>
Subject: [Fwd: GM vs MICROSOFT ha ha what a match]
From: Mark Fridenstine <laceyf@crosslink.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 20:05:39 -0800
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------39894E356DCD7B8AC99BA964



--------------39894E356DCD7B8AC99BA964
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-Path: <Lnicepair@aol.com>
Received: from lycanthrope.crosslink.net ([206.246.124.36] verified)
  by mailserver1.crosslink.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.1)
  with ESMTP id 1923386 for laceyf@yeti.crosslink.net; Sat, 20 Nov 1999 
06:00:30 -0500
Received: from imo-d08.mx.aol.com (imo-d08.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.40]) by 
lycanthrope.crosslink.net (8.9.3/) with ESMTP id GAA15502 for 
<laceyf@crosslink.net>; Sat, 20 Nov 1999 06:00:30 -0500
From: Lnicepair@aol.com
X-Really-To: <laceyf@crosslink.net>
Received: from Lnicepair@aol.com
        by imo-d08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v24.4.) id n.0.a7abba90 (4155);
        Sat, 20 Nov 1999 05:59:52 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <0.a7abba90.2567d927@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1999 05:59:51 EST
Subject: GM vs MICROSOFT ha ha what a match
To: adameron@wrightline.com, adameron@cadetmail.uscga.edu,
        baw4458@llp.relteccorp.com, cdameron@cadetmail.uscga.edu,
        RGiovannuc@aol.com, EAH917@aol.com, molson39@juno.com,
        ronault@bellsouth.net, jjwallen@erols.com, Duck110@aol.com,
        laceyf@crosslink.net, LosTejanos@aol.com, Brokenboat2@aol.com,
        bruce.walsh@na.marconicomms.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Windows AOL sub 45

>GM vs. Microsoft
>>
>> > At a recent computer expo (COMDEX), Bill Gates
>> > reportedly compared the
>> > > computer industry with the auto  industry and
>> > stated, "If GM had kept
>> > > up with the technology like the  computer industry
>> >  has, we would all
>> > > be driving $25.00 cars that got  1,000 miles to
>> > the gallon."
>> > >
>> > > In response to Bill's comments, General Motors
>> > issued a press release
>> > > stating: If GM had developed technology like
>> > Microsoft,  we would all
>> > > be driving cars with the following
>> > characteristics:
>> > >
>> > > 1. For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash
>> > twice a day.
>> > >
>> > > 2. Every time they repainted the lines in the
>> > road, you would  have to buy a  new car.
>> > >
>> > > 3. Occasionally your car would die on the freeway
>> > for no reason.  You would have to pull over to the
>> >side of the road,  close all of  the windows, shut off
>> >the car, restart it, and reopen  the windows before
>> > > you could  continue. For some reason you would
>> > simply accept  this.
>> > >
>> > > 4. Occasionally, executing a maneuver such as a
>> > left turn would cause your car to shut down and
>> >refuse to restart, in which case you would
>> > > have to reinstall the engine.
>> > >
>> > > 5. Only one person at a time could use the car
>> > unless you bought  "CarNT",  but then you would
>> >have to buy more seats.
>> > >
>> > > 6. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by
>> > the sun, was reliable, five times as fast and twice as easy to
>> > drive-but would only  run on five percent of the roads.
>> > >
>> > > 7. The oil, water temperature, and alternator
>> > warning lights  would  all be replaced by a single
>> >"General Protection Fault"  warning light.
>> > >
>> > > 8. New seats would force everyone to have the same
>> > sized butt.
>> > >
>> > > 9. The airbag system would ask "Are you sure?"
>> > before deploying.
>> > >
>> > > 10. Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your
>> > car would lock you  out  and refuse to let you in
>> >until you simultaneously lifted the door
>> > > handle, turned the key, and grabbed hold of the
>> > radio  antenna.
>> > >
>> > > 11. GM would require all car buyers to also
>> > purchase a deluxe  set of  Rand McNally road
>> >maps (now a GM subsidiary), even though they
>> > > neither need  nor want them. Attempting to
>> >delete this  option would immediately cause the
>> > car's performance to diminish by 50% or more.
>> > > Moreover, GM would  become a target for
>> > investigation by the Justice Dept.
>> > >
>> > > 12. Every time GM introduced a new car, car buyers
>> > would have to learn to drive all over again because
>> >none of the  controls would operate in
>> > > the  same manner as the old car.
>> > >
>> > > 13. You'd press the "Start" button to shut off the
>> > engine.
>


--------------39894E356DCD7B8AC99BA964--


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Fwd: GM vs MICROSOFT ha ha what a match], Mark Fridenstine <=