tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 260 vs 289

To: DJoh797014@aol.com
Subject: Re: 260 vs 289
From: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@socal.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:14:36 -0700
Dave,

Did the math.  See annotation to your numbers.

A respectable 0.06 EXTRA horsepower per cubic inch.  Should get even 
more, per cubic inch, with aluminum head, good ports, bigger valves, 
better cam (like the hipo 289 was 271 HP).

In my day, 1 horsepower per cubic inch was really something. 260 HP 260 
CID would be an example.  Small engines could do this readily.  A 72 
cubic inch engine (1500 cc) could easily get 72 HP, and 100 HP with some 
TLC and $$$$. in the 50's. (BTDT)  Of course the smaller ones responded 
easier.

DJoh797014@aol.com wrote:

>The stock 260 with Ford 2 bbl had 164 HP. ADDED: (0.63 Horsepower/Cubic Inch)
>The stock 289 with Ford 2 bbl had 200 HP. ADDED: (0.69 Horsepower/Cubic Inch)
>
>Do the math.
>  
>
-- 
-----

Steve Laifman
Editor
http://www.TigersUnited.com





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>