tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger?

To: "'Steve Laifman'" <slaifman@socal.rr.com>, "'Jim Sencindiver'"
Subject: Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger?
From: "Jim" <jim@island.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 18:41:11 -0700
Steve...

What are you suspicious about exactly?
No, it doesn't have 'tie-downs' and we all know what it looks like...but it
HAS been TAC'ed .... and I only know of one car that was TAC'ed and turned
out it wasn't quite what it was supposed to be... Geez... I saw a Tiger with
a complete Alpine front half TAC'ed at TUXXX
What exactly is the argument here ??

Jim G.
B382000446

-----Original Message-----
From: tigers-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:tigers-bounces@autox.team.net]
On Behalf Of Steve Laifman
Sent: June 3, 2010 5:48 PM
To: Jim Sencindiver
Cc: AAAGLASSS@aol.com; tigers@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger?

Jim,

See who actually signed the TAC certificate.  It is ON the certificate.  
Norman's web site also contains a list of certified and assigned TAC 
numbers:

http://www.rootes1.com/


I am getting very suspicious due to your statement about "spare tire tie 
downs".  The Tiger does not  have "tie-downs". Here I am envisioning a 
leather set of belts to hold the spare against the froward end of the 
trunk to tie it down vertically in the convenient well (not used in a 
Tiger).  The Tiger design  fits on the floor atop a welded stamped  bell 
with an in-caged nut, and held with a center hole fitting plate and 
bolted to the floor mount.

The Alpine mounted the tire vertically  at the front of the trunk 
compartment.

Here are some Pics of Denis Mercier's Mk IA spare tire mounted.

http://www.facebook.com/album.php?id=1360287247&aid=23591&l=f21ac448f1&s=40&;
hash=be4d7e7777b27c1b89f399d67213f99b 
<cid:part1.07070901.05040704@socal.rr.com>


"Don't Look a Gift Tiger in the Mouth!"

    (Pic of Roaring Tiger - won't go through List)

Steve

Steve Laifman

Editor

http://TigersUnited.com



Jim Sencindiver wrote:
> I don't see the Mk II specific spare tire tie downs and the battery tie
down
> is wrong.  But it has been TACed and the 3 Inspectors saw enough evidence
> that it was originally manufactured as a Tiger to authenticate it.  I
would
> have to say it's not an Alger.
>
> Keep on Tigering!
> Jim Sencindiver
> B382100451/TAC 448
_______________________________________________
Tigers@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe/Manage:
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/jim@island.net
_______________________________________________
Tigers@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>