Theo, That's the way I see it too. I was just surprised to see "that's
where the alpine exhaust passed through without qualifying the statement.
Thanks. M
On 6/4/10 6:14 PM, "Smit, Theo" <Theo.Smit@dynastream.com> wrote:
> From looking at the pictures it appears that the car in question has a custom
> built X frame, presumably to replace rotted original components. That doesn't
> make it an Alger, nor would the use of X frame components from an Alpine in an
> eventual re-restoration (in the absence of wholesale replacement of many other
> chassis panels).
> Evidently the TAC inspectors were able to confirm enough of the rest of the
> bodyshell's construction that it got the TAC certificate. TAC does not imply
> that the bodyshell is completely original, just that there is sufficient
> evidence that the bodyshell was assembled as a Tiger by Rootes or their
> subsidiaries.
>
> Theo
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: tigers-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:tigers-
>> bounces@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Would U. Believe
>> Sent: June 4, 2010 3:39 PM
>> To: Greg Koss; Tiger's Den
>> Subject: Re: [Tigers] Are This a Tiger?
>>
>> Ummmmm..... How can that be if the car is a TACed MkII Tiger? Is what
>> you
>> are saying that the car is a fraud (Alger)?
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole
> use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or
> any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
> please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>
> Thank you for your cooperation.
_______________________________________________
Tigers@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
|