triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TR6 clutch problem

To: <QAGroup@aol.com>, <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net>
Subject: Re: TR6 clutch problem
From: "STU-JO" <STU-JO@prodigy.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 19:47:53 -0400
Yes, I had the same problem. I replaced every component including the yoke
and cross shaft,  and had a good 3/4 " play in the system. I put 1/2"
spacers between the slave and the bellhousing. After three years no
problems

----------
From: QAGroup@aol.com
To: triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: TR6 clutch problem
Date: Sunday, July 27, 1997 10:44 PM

This seems to be a popular subject these days.  I get 1/2" to 5/8" travel
out
of the clutch slave cylinder and still can't engage/shift.  I'm using the
middle hole on the fork thingy.  All new components and has good fork
pin/shaft fit. Many years ago on this same car I had to cut the pushrod and
weld in a 1/2" section to make the clutch work better - I got tired of a
clutch always grabbing close to the floor and this gave me a higher pedal.
 Prior to taking the car off the road 8 years ago I replaced the pushrod
because the hole in the old one was worn.  So I know this one (stock
length)
has worked but I possibly had it in the upper hole.  My question is is
there
anything WRONG with using the upper hole?  You gain more travel at the
expense of a harder pedal.  I plan on trying this out once I get the brakes
worked out.  Have any of you used the upper hole on the clutch shaft and
why
did you need to use it?

Thanks,
Randy Kosow
'73 TR6 CF814UO

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>