Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42

To:	stu.jo@ibm.net
Subject:	Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42
From:	Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>
Date:	Fri, 26 Sep 1997 16:38:21 -0400
Cc:	dstauffa@csc.com, jruwaldt@indiana.edu, triumphs@Autox.Team.Net
Organization:	BRIT Inc
References:	<8825651E.0052BF07.00@csc.com> <342C3F7D.3F4A@ibm.net>

stu.jo@ibm.net wrote:
> However, my point was that government agencies have grossly overstated
> the danger of many of these things.

  Much like the automotive press have greatly overstated
the need for lead, and like the automotive public greatly
overstate the need for horsepower anyways.

  Most arguments from both sides are absurd.

-- 
Trevor Boicey
Ottawa, Canada
tboicey@brit.ca
http://www.brit.ca/~tboicey/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42, (continued) Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42, Tom Tweed Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42, Bollen Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42, Trevor Boicey Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42, James Charles Ruwaldt Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42, William Davies Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42, dstauffa Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42, Shane F. Ingate Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42, Douglas Mitchell Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42, Trevor Boicey Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42, stu.jo Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42, Trevor Boicey <= Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42, tom.omalley Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42, Mark A. Erickson Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42, George Richardson Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42, Darrell

Previous by Date:	Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42, stu.jo
Next by Date:	GT6/Spitfire Rear Spring Direction, SSwan60
Previous by Thread:	Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42, stu.jo
Next by Thread:	Re: Chemistry? Was: SB42, tom.omalley
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]