triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Side view mirrors

To: triumphs@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: Re: Side view mirrors
From: kinderlehrer@mindspring.com (Kinderlehrer's)
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 1998 23:31:16 -0400 (EDT)
Gary,
I bought those mirrors from Moss to replace the pitting ones on the car,  I
have covex and even though I don't care for them, I decided to get convex
again.

I don't care for them because it is real difficult to judge distance of
"Objects in Mirror", at least for me.  However, since they are way out in
front on the fendres, excuse me, wings, I thought that the flat mirror
would just not show enough.  But, hey, I could be wrong.

I haven't put the new ones on yet, but I have to admit that I was a little
disappointed.  They are not the real heavy chrome of the originals.  In
fact, the back of the mirror appears to be polished aluminum.  But it was a
good price and I am sure they will look good on the car.

Bob

>I am doing a frame up restoration on a 59 TR3A that the previous DPO had
>partially dismantled and filled boxes with parts from this and other TR's.  I
>am about to begin work on the body and noticed the special price on mirrors
>that Moss has in it's latest flyer.  My question is: On a left hand drive car
>of my vintage, are both mirrors flat or convex, or is one flat and the other
>convex, or does it make any difference?  Also, if it doesn"t make any
>difference, what is the preferred combination as the mirrors are mounted quite
>far from the driver.
>Thanks in advance for any insight on this.
>
>Gary Bouffard
>59 TR3A
>TS 58399



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>