triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Just a comment from the peanut gallery

To: Lftlesl@aol.com
Subject: Re: Just a comment from the peanut gallery
From: Susan and John Roper <vscjohn@huntnet.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 20:36:15 -0600
Cc: bzw8@cdc.gov, triumphs@autox.team.net
Organization: Vintage Sporting Cars
References: <b6a0b371.36f0302f@aol.com>
I agree Les.  Perhaps Jeff will let us know when he feels better.  Don't forget
British Car Day in Metairie Saturday.  John

Lftlesl@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 3/17/99 4:02:04 PM Central Standard Time, bzw8@cdc.gov
> writes:
>
> << I hope not to offend anyone but this list seems to be getting bombed alot
>  with what I would call "Idle chat emails" between users.   It seems it would
>  more beneficial to send some of these responses directly to a person rather
>  than the entire list.  Ity seems the list is being used entirely too much
>  for "chat" back and forth that really doesn't contain anything beneficial to
>  the list group.  Maybe I'm just PMSing but the result is hundreds of
>  postings a day of redundant BS.  Normal answers to questions and informative
>  postings seem  fine and again, I don't want to offend anyone just make the
>  list a little more efficient.
>
>  Thanks,
>
>  Jeff in Atlanta
>   >>
> I'm not offended, but I disagree. I like reading all the idle chat. I don't
> always respond or get involved in the strings, but I still read almost
> everything posted to the list. See, I don't just like the cars, I like the
> people who like the cars. All the random thoughts posted to the list increase
> my enjoyment of our hobby and my appreciation for the people who share it. I
> suggest that if you don't have time to read all the postings, scan the
> headings and use the "delete" button. Alternatively, subscribe to the digest.
> Personally, I'm not into "efficiency" -- or else I would not have a Triumph!
> Just my .02.
> Cheers,
> Les Landon
> 1962 TR3B TCF644L
> Baton Rouge, LA




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>