triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Chromed or Stainless Brakes Better?

To: CarlSereda@aol.com, triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Chromed or Stainless Brakes Better?
From: Cliff Hansen <chansen@access1.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 1999 17:46:04 -0400
Carl,

I replaced my OEM pistons with stainless last year.  No problems with
fit or function.  I got the pistons from TRF, they were about $20 each,
I could have got chromed steel for about $12.  Thirty two bucks was
small enough price not to worry about corroding brake parts.

BTW, you don't have to separate the calipers to replace the pistons.
Whether you should separate them at all, well, I don't want to start
that again.  But if you do separate them, the torque numbers I got
from TRF are 75 ft-lbs for the large bolts, 45 ft-lbs for the small ones.


At 03:03 PM 9/7/99 EDT, CarlSereda@aol.com wrote:
>
>Hi List,
>I want to replace the four pistons in my TR4 brake disc calipers as they are 
>35 years old and well rusted outside the bore seal and rust is working
inward.
>I never saw chrome look so good (on the intact part) and imagine that is why 
>the seals works so well. I am a little dubious of the finish on the
stainless 
>pistons (can't imagine it is as smooth as this chrome).
>Anyone compare the two pistons (chrome vs stainless) side by side?
>In another 35 years I will be 78 (and maybe too rusty myself to drive) so I 
>am tempted to go chrome for the best sealing properties and they're a little 
>cheaper too.
>Any counter opinions on this? And are some vendors known for better pistons 
>than others?
>Carl
>'64 TR4 since '74
>
>
Cliff Hansen
chansen@access1.net
1966 TR-4A CTC 64615L


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>