triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: vacuum advance/retard differences? Ha Ha! Zero!

To: Mike Kitchener <mikek@wanadoo.fr>
Subject: RE: vacuum advance/retard differences? Ha Ha! Zero!
From: David Massey <105671.471@compuserve.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 18:44:19 -0400
Cc: "'105671.471@compuserve.com '" <105671.471@compuserve.com>, "'Triumphs@autox.team.net '" <Triumphs@autox.team.net>
Message text written by Mike Kitchener
>Fill a balloon with water. place a small rock on top of the balloon. The
weight of the rock is compressing the water. (ridiculously small amount,
but
nevertheless the separation of molecules is less). (use a piston and a rock
if the elasticity of the balloon walls give you pause.
There it will sit forever (or until the water evaporates throught the
balloon), taking no energy and compessing the water. Fairly efficient I
would say. Efficasy is a different matter.
<

Pumping water into a boiler where it is converted to steam and where the
steam exits via another pipe to a turbine or piston means that new water
needs to be pumped into the boiler.  Pumping water at a non-zero rate of
flow from a low pressure to a high pressure requires work (energy).  Just
like lifting weights.  Holding a weight up in a static position does not
require work and can be accomplished with a wood board.  Just like letting
a rock rest on your baloon.  But lifting rocks in succession to set on
baloons of water in succession takes work.  After a while my back gives
out. (after about 127 baloons or so).

I'm not as young as I used to be.

Cheers

Dave

///  triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
///  with nothing in it but
///
///     unsubscribe triumphs
///
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>