triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Carb vs. PI question

To: ralittle2@mindspring.com, Triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Carb vs. PI question
From: "Michael Gajic" <michaelgajic@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 19:13:37 +1000 FILETIME=[D8C42BD0:01C1516B]
Ashford wrote:

I was looking over some Triumph material and this question came to mind. Why 
is it that the fuel injected TR6 had so much more power than the carb 
models?  I know that fuel injection allows more precise metering of fuel and 
all that, but 50hp worth.

The main reasons for the 46HP gain are that the PI car had:

1. a wild camshaft (valve timing 35/65/65/35 compared to 10/50/50/10 on the 
carb'd cars)

2. increased compression ratio of 9.5:1 compared to 8.6:1 on carb'd cars


This question is further confused by the fact that my father's Morgan Plus 8 
recently threw off it's fuel injection and went to carburetors.  This change 
will fix it's driveability problem, but will also result in an additional 20 
or so horsepower gain.

I have no idea of the effects of PI on the Rover V8, I'd like to know 
though, someone on the list must know why?

But some people belive that the Morgan's drivability problems have more to 
do with them having the ergonomics of a pre-WW2 car ;-) (not me though)


Just curious

As am I, its the only way to learn ;-)

Cheers,
Michael
63' TR4
Sydney, Australia

_________________________________________________________________

///  triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
///  with nothing in it but
///
///     unsubscribe triumphs
///
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>