[Top] [All Lists]

[TR] Planned obsolescence

To: dave <>, list <>
Subject: [TR] Planned obsolescence
From: "Paul Dorsey" <>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:00:41 -0500
Dave, et al
You say these TR 3's originally were intended to last only seven years?  Was
that number intended or did it just turn out that way?
        Were American cars, at that time, built to last longer? What's the 
obsolescence' of cars built today?  Here and abroad?

Rolls Royce's might be the top of the scale... let's say a '10'.  Seven year's
of 'proud livability' (my term) for a TR3 might only be a '5' on this
contrived product obsolecense scale.  Yet much better than today's...

Thanks, Paul Dorsey

===  This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>