vintage-race
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: wet underwear

To: Gonridn2@aol.com, vintage-race@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: wet underwear
From: Tombread@aol.com
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 11:54:05 EDT
In a message dated 8/30/02 10:11:49 AM US Eastern Standard Time, 
Gonridn2@aol.com writes:


> Both arguments are valid, they are just different arguments.  Wet cloth 
> ignites less rapidly than dry (but it feels better).  

In any case, the fabric doesn't ignite.  It's a matter of heat transferal.
Nomex or similar is a barrier and an insulator.  You can cook Nomex to death 
and all it does is become more charred, but it will not ignite.  

BTW, I think we're talking about safety margins measured in roughly 3-second 
increments.  If single-layer Nomex provides about 4-5 seconds of time-to-burn 
and double layer gets you to say 14 (I don't remember exactly), the issue if 
you are fully dressed with triple-layers and underwear becomes one of air 
supply.

Does anyone have the time-to-burn numbers for CarbonX?  What do Sparco and 
OMP say?

      Tom Butters    

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/vintage-race


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>