[JONAT] RE: FYI

Bob jonat@autox.team.net
Thu Dec 4 19:11:02 2003


Gregory

If you are having a dinner in these centres, and you do not have a sponsor,
then the participants will have to pay (am I following you correctly?).
Then, you will need to collect money from participants, and hence a Sector
fee and back to where we started.  Or collecting money at the door - still a
form of sector fee but more of a user-pay type approach but tougheer to
predict numbers.

I'm suspecting (or hoping?) that 25-30 people might be a light for your
area, but it all depends upon how much PR you do locally, and how much
national and international press we can get.  It's a good place to start
though.

Bob


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dr Gregory Andrachuk" <v12-vdp@shaw.ca>
To: <jonat@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: [JONAT] RE: FYI


> Bob:
>     I don't see how we can get sponsors to pay for a dinner for all the
> participants; in our sectors we will have a dinner in Victoria and one in
> Vancouver. Presumably you did not mean this? I am hoping that we can have
a
> welcome reception in each city sponsored perhaps by the dealers (they
don't
> know this yet!!!!). We have out hotel arrangements in both cities pretty
> firm: we are counting on 25 rooms in Victoria and 30 in Vancouver (because
> some Victoria people will be continuing on). Is this the sort of number we
> are working with in other sectors?
>                                             Gregory
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bob" <engl@accesscomm.ca>
> To: <jonat@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:10 PM
> Subject: RE: [JONAT] RE: FYI
>
>
> : I think if ALL Sectors could agree to no fee for participants on a
Sector
> : basis, that would certainly simplify things.  I would assume then that
any
> : planned events would be covered 100% by sponsorships arranged by the
> Sectors
> : themselves (?)
> :
> : If we can do the same JONAT-wide, so much the better.  However, when you
> add
> : in things like insurance, someone will have to work pretty hard to work
> this
> : one through.
> :
> : On the other hand, charging $0 might not attract participants either.  I
> : have learned over the years that people generally place value on items
> based
> : on what the have had to pay for it ( in hours, dollars, or whatever).
My
> : own personal thought would be to have at least a JONAT wide fee kept to
a
> : minimum - any and all profits to charity.
> :
> : Bob England