[Shotimes] Re: Dynomax mufflers bit the dust

[Donald Mallinson]

Dave,

I for one knew that the Dynomax would not last as long as 
the stock system.  I tell other people about it.  But of 
course, the bigger sound is worth it to me!  ;)

If I had it to do over again with my '89 SHO, I would have 
bought the Borla System to begin with.  Even at the inflated 
prices at the beginning, it would have paid for itself!

Next full system will be stainless on any car I plan to keep.

Don Mallinson

Dave Kegel wrote:
> I see so many people say this and I don't get it.  It's called, "You get
> what you pay for".  What you should really be saying is "Never buying cheap
> non-stainless mufflers again".  The fact that they are Dynomax has nothing
> to do with it.  In fact, for the price, they sound very good and flow pretty
> well.  If you want mufflers that last a long time, you have to buy
> stainless.
> 
> The thing that cracks me up is that people hack off the stock stainless SHO
> system that will last 200k miles or so and replace it with cheap aluminized
> stuff, and then complain that it rusts out.  They should have left it alone
> to begin with.
> 
> Dave Kegel
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Craig D" <viperrt45099@yahoo.com>
> To: <shotimes@autox.team.net>
> Sent: December 09, 2002 3:47 PM
> Subject: [Shotimes] Re: Dynomax mufflers bit the dust
> 
> 
>  Never buying Dynomax agian
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes