[Shotimes] Dyno results posted

[Ron Porter]

Looking at those goofy graphs, and not getting corrected numbers, tells me
that they didn't learn their Dynojet very well!! They DEFINITELY need to
have that Dynojet rep explain some things to them!!  I'm sure that Don can
chime in here.

Yes, the corrected numbers for temp/baro/humidity are the numbers to be
looked at, since you can then compare them to dyno runs if you do it again
in 70-degree, low humidity conditions.

The raw numbers are not always useful, but personally I used the raw numbers
in 40-degree, low-humidity, high barometer readings, as they are higher than
the corrected #s, which are set at somewhere around 70 degrees. Both sets of
numbers can be useful for comparison.

Ron Porter



-----Original Message-----
From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
On Behalf Of Carl Prochilo
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 4:36 PM
To: shotimes@autox.team.net
Subject: RE: [Shotimes] Dyno results posted


What does "corrected numbers" mean?  Are you talking about some type of
normalization taking into account weather?

Basically what I'm dealing with is a brand new business.  The people have
not had an opportunity to even get a Dynojet rep come and explain the
system to them.  Considering that, it is amazing they can do what they
can.
-- 
Cheers,
Carl Prochilo
92 Ultra Red Crimson

On Sun, August 15, 2004 1:06 pm, Ron Porter said:
> That's a "different looking" set of Dynojet charts.
>
> Anyway, upon reading the text, I'm assuming that those are "raw", and not
> corrected numbers? In that kind of weather, corrected numbers will be more
> meaningful. Hopefully, he gave you both the raw & corrected numbers.
>
> The HP looks fine for 91-degree heat + humidity.
>
> Ron Porter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
> On Behalf Of Carl Prochilo
> Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2004 3:42 PM
> To: shotimes@autox.team.net
> Subject: [Shotimes] Dyno results posted
>
>
> http://tinyurl.com/57t6p
>
> I was expecting a little more HP, maybe 5 or 6 based on comparisons with
> others that have similar setup.  The ambient temp was 91 degrees.
>
> The guy running the dyno was amazed at the consistency for each of the 4
> pulls.  He said he does a lot of hot rods and has never seen the machine
> produce these consistent results.
>
> I will have to go back later when they get their A/F ratio measurement
> device.  I need to know that information to see if the LPM needs to be
> tweeked, which I believe it does.
>
> All four pulls were done in 3rd gear.  Is that the correct gear to take
> the measurements?
>
> The car has
> o  3.2L upgrade with 3.0L profile intake cams
> o  port matching on the intake
> o  77mm Pro-M MAF with SHOShop Can
> o  UDPs
> o  P+ Y-pipe and Walker Dynomax cat-back.
> --
> Cheers,
> Carl Prochilo
> 92 Ultra Red Crimson
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes