[Shotimes] Dyno results posted

[Carl Prochilo]

I assume most people will post the corrected, or normalized numbers.  I'll
try to see if I can get that information.  I can't tell if they're raw or
not.

For anyone versed in reading this data, do you know what STD: 1.04 means?

What is the defacto standard for converting to engine HP?
-- 
Cheers,
Carl Prochilo
92 Ultra Red Crimson

On Sun, August 15, 2004 5:04 pm, Ron Porter said:
> Looking at those goofy graphs, and not getting corrected numbers, tells me
> that they didn't learn their Dynojet very well!! They DEFINITELY need to
> have that Dynojet rep explain some things to them!!  I'm sure that Don can
> chime in here.
>
> Yes, the corrected numbers for temp/baro/humidity are the numbers to be
> looked at, since you can then compare them to dyno runs if you do it again
> in 70-degree, low humidity conditions.
>
> The raw numbers are not always useful, but personally I used the raw
> numbers
> in 40-degree, low-humidity, high barometer readings, as they are higher
> than
> the corrected #s, which are set at somewhere around 70 degrees. Both sets
> of
> numbers can be useful for comparison.
>
> Ron Porter
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
> On Behalf Of Carl Prochilo
> Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 4:36 PM
> To: shotimes@autox.team.net
> Subject: RE: [Shotimes] Dyno results posted
>
>
> What does "corrected numbers" mean?  Are you talking about some type of
> normalization taking into account weather?
>
> Basically what I'm dealing with is a brand new business.  The people have
> not had an opportunity to even get a Dynojet rep come and explain the
> system to them.  Considering that, it is amazing they can do what they
> can.
> --
> Cheers,
> Carl Prochilo
> 92 Ultra Red Crimson
>
> On Sun, August 15, 2004 1:06 pm, Ron Porter said:
>> That's a "different looking" set of Dynojet charts.
>>
>> Anyway, upon reading the text, I'm assuming that those are "raw", and
>> not
>> corrected numbers? In that kind of weather, corrected numbers will be
>> more
>> meaningful. Hopefully, he gave you both the raw & corrected numbers.
>>
>> The HP looks fine for 91-degree heat + humidity.
>>
>> Ron Porter
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net
>> [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
>> On Behalf Of Carl Prochilo
>> Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2004 3:42 PM
>> To: shotimes@autox.team.net
>> Subject: [Shotimes] Dyno results posted
>>
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/57t6p
>>
>> I was expecting a little more HP, maybe 5 or 6 based on comparisons with
>> others that have similar setup.  The ambient temp was 91 degrees.
>>
>> The guy running the dyno was amazed at the consistency for each of the 4
>> pulls.  He said he does a lot of hot rods and has never seen the machine
>> produce these consistent results.
>>
>> I will have to go back later when they get their A/F ratio measurement
>> device.  I need to know that information to see if the LPM needs to be
>> tweeked, which I believe it does.
>>
>> All four pulls were done in 3rd gear.  Is that the correct gear to take
>> the measurements?
>>
>> The car has
>> o  3.2L upgrade with 3.0L profile intake cams
>> o  port matching on the intake
>> o  77mm Pro-M MAF with SHOShop Can
>> o  UDPs
>> o  P+ Y-pipe and Walker Dynomax cat-back.
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Carl Prochilo
>> 92 Ultra Red Crimson
>> _______________________________________________
>> Shotimes mailing list
>> Shotimes@autox.team.net
>> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes