[Shotimes] 92 MTX fluid capacity

[Dave]

Well my 90 shifted ok with the ATF, After I did the clutch ATF went back 
in and it was a bit harder to shift and I won't swear to it Ron but I 
think you and I had this conversation at Lapeer and switched to the gear 
lube and it was pretty good. Then I did a 50/50 mix gear lube ATF and it 
shifts great now. So I would say use what works and play with it till 
you find it.
Dave

Ron Porter wrote:

>I doubt that Ford has records on that, but I would say it is safe to assume
>that 100% of '92s have composite, and probably 90%+ of '91s, with only some
>very early '91s with brass. Being later in the model year, all Plus models
>would have composite.
>
>The tranny I had out of the '91 flat-out would not shift with Mobil 1.
>Cheapo AZ gear oil worked the best (after trying a few different lubes). It
>may have been a very early '91 tranny, r the '91 had a replacement installed
>at some point.
>
>The fluid is easy enough to change. Just basically keep trying stuff until
>you find one that shifts well.
>
>Ron Porter
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
>On Behalf Of Carl Prochilo
>Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 5:57 PM
>To: shotimes@autox.team.net
>Subject: RE: [Shotimes] 92 MTX fluid capacity
>
>I wonder if Ford's BOM system has the break-in date for that EC.  I wasn't
>sure of the actual cutover.  I thought Doug Lewis once said sometime in 92
>MY once.  But I can say that ATF does work better in my tranny than MTL
>because I went with the latter not understanding the difference in parts. 
>Only after I got the 3.2 and DonD installed the drain plug and put the new
>fluid in did I realize the difference.  You literally can shift the car
>with 2 fingers.

[demime 0.99d.1 removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of showerks.vcf]