cams in a 3.2 was RE: Re: [Shotimes] 89 sho dyno charts posted

[Ian Fisher]

What was the max duty cycle you were running the 3.2
injectors? We have very similar setups. I was going to
run the 3.2 injectors but if they were closing in on
90% or so I will reconsider..

Ian


--- Bruce Malachuk <bmalach1@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

> IIRC last I knew mark was running stock 3.0
> injectors. I will have a set of
> 3.2 injectors that were cleaned, balanced, and have
> only been run 6k since
> their install. Should have them off the car in a
> week. With the tweecer and
> tuning of injector slopes it was easy to make sure
> the slightly higer flow
> injectors were just right.
> 
> I have a set of 30# accels that I want to throw into
> the car, as per eec
> analyzer in theory I should be closing in on the
> injector's upper end, and
> if the SHOshop headers make good numbers and I add
> them I'm gonna want the
> buffer in the % of use. 
> 
> 
> Bruce J Malachuk
> 
> *	94 Opal Frost MTX 
> *	93 Emerald Green MTX - SOLD 
> *	93 Black ATX - New Parts CAR 
> *	95 Silver Frost ATX SE - SLO -Buyer waiting 
> *	96 TR - Cam Failed parts car :-(
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net
> [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
> On Behalf Of Ian Fisher
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 10:46 PM
> To: Mark Nunnally; shotimes@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: cams in a 3.2 was RE: Re: [Shotimes] 89
> sho dyno charts posted
> 
> Sweet-any adjustable sprocket settings that you
> recommend for the street?
> 
> What injectors are you using? 
> 
> Ian
> 
> --- Mark Nunnally <marknunnally@JoiMail.com> wrote:
> 
> > > Any speculation as to what kind of tq losses
> would
> > be
> > > realized with a bump in displacement? In other
> > words,
> > > if we can figure out an average of the percent
> of
> > tq
> > > lost across the rev band with +20 cams on a 3.0,
> > does
> > > anyone think that percent average would remain
> the same or drop if 
> > > running the cams on a 3.2 (vs
> > stock
> > > cams or 3.0 cams)?
> > 
> > Apples to apples (same thing in both motors) I'd
> say ~7% increase 
> > (same as displacement bump)
> > 
> > My 3.2L made more torque at mid/low rpm than a
> same BOS 3.0L engine, 
> > but both engines were making the same torque from
> about 6000 rpm on.  
> > Which tells me the cams/intake, etc are a cork for
> all out top end HP 
> > on anything bigger than 183 CI.
> > 
> > Thus to answer your question, a 3.2L going from
> stock, to a better 
> > breathing head/cam/runner is going to probably
> "wake up" more than a 
> > 3.0L would.
> > 
> > mark
> > _______________________________________________
> > Shotimes mailing list
> > Shotimes@autox.team.net
> > http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Discover Yahoo! 
Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing and more. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/stayintouch.html