datsun-roadsters
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Should I add a Header?

To: datsunmike <datsunmike@nyc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Should I add a Header?
From: Pamela Pepoy <gppepoy@cybertrails.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 18:47:37 -0800
Mike,
What is Jet Hotted. Who does it?  Why would you do it?  How much does it cost?
Oh, I have a set of stainless steel headers on my 1600.
Guy
67.5 SPL
Tempe, AZ

datsunmike wrote:

> Andrew,
>
> I really don't think headers add much to the performance as the stock
> headers were pretty good. However headers weigh a lot less and the rest you
> said is true also.
>
> Mike
>
> BTW, have them Jet Hotted. I just got mine back a few weeks ago and they
> look awesome. I had them Jet Hotted about 8 years ago and they have a
> lifetime guarantee which they honor. They look like chrome!!!!!
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrew Murphy" <solex67@hotmail.com>
> To: <noji@snowman.med.umn.edu>
> Cc: <datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 3:27 PM
> Subject: Re: Should I add a Header?
>
> > Since I am restoring my 67 2000, I have asked this question of both
> > knowledgeable people and the vendors (who are also knowledgeable of
> course)
> > and I go the same response: Unless you are going for the total stock
> > restoration, the header has many advantages over the manifold.
> >
> > 1. Price. At least half the price of a manifold
> > 2. Endurance. Tend to last longer and crack less
> > 3. Performance. I have been told that the header will increase
> performance.
> > 4. Looks. Nice lines as opposed to the rough outlines of the manifold.
> >
> > Put it this way, I have a stock 2000 manifold and will probably sell it in
> > favor of putting a nice header on my 67 2000.
> >
> > Andrew Murphy
> > SoCalROC
> >
> >
> > From: dana nojima <noji@snowman.med.umn.edu>
> > Reply-To: dana nojima <noji@snowman.med.umn.edu>
> > CC: datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
> > Subject: Re: Should I add a Header?
> > Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 04:08:32 -0800
> > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > Received: from [207.173.21.42] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
> > MHotMailBC236A4D000D40043191CFAD152A13850; Mon Jan 08 12:13:04 2001
> > Received: (from majordom@localhost)by teamfat2.dsl.aros.net
> (8.11.0/8.11.0)
> > id f08K7cS29244for datsun-roadsters-actors; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 13:07:38 -0700
> > (MST)
> > From datsun-roadsters-owner@autox.team.net Mon Jan 08 12:14:59 2001
> > X-Authentication-Warning: teamfat2.dsl.aros.net: majordom set sender to
> > owner-datsun-roadsters@Autox.Team.Net using -f
> > Message-ID: <3A5AFF40.3313448B@snowman.med.umn.edu>
> > X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
> > X-Accept-Language: en
> > References: <a3.10307328.278b6f57@aol.com>
> > Sender: owner-datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
> > Precedence: bulk
> >
> > Robert,
> >
> > There are several potential advantages with going with headers.
> >
> >    If you every remove the starter, it is much easier with headers.
> >
> >    Potential power increase.
> >
> >    They originals had a tendency to rot out.
> >
> >    They look and sound good.
> >
> > As always, YMMV,
> >
> > Dana
> >
> > CalSpeed@aol.com wrote:
> >
> >  > In a message dated 1/8/01 6:16:50 PM !!!First Boot!!!,
> > Robert.Long@CSDInc.com
> >  > writes:
> >  >
> >  > << What are people's thoughts on replacing the stock manifold with a
> > header?
> >  > >>
> >  >
> >  > On my U20 Solex it is wonderful!  Quite loud but well worth the swap
> for
> >  > power.
> >  >
> >  > Calspeed
> >  > <A HREF="http://members.aol.com/calspeed1/motorsports.html";>Calspeed
> > Datsun
> >  > Motorsports</A>
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>