fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fot] chevy con-rods

To: fot team <fot@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Fot] chevy con-rods
From: Bill Babcock <billb@bnj.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:35:55 -0700
Most old designs have rod bearings that are too wide. Any plain bearing width
and diameter is a compromise. Excessive width and excess diameter not only
increase friction, they can actually wear faster

>
> the though of narrower rods at the big end region worries me.
>
> I run an engine shop, and know from bitter experience, that excessive side
> clearance at the big end, is a major source of engine rattles and loss of
> oil pressure. most rods have a limit of about 0.005"-0.008" and in our race
> engines, we run them down as low as we can get.
>
> there are plenty of custom made rods for TR engines, so why would one
bother
> with an concept that has an intrinsic design flaw?
>
> Terry O'Beirne
_______________________________________________
fot@autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>