land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Four-Valve Pentroof Chamber VS Two-Valve Hemi Ditto

To: ardunbill@webtv.net
Subject: Re: Four-Valve Pentroof Chamber VS Two-Valve Hemi Ditto
From: Bryan Savage <basavage@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:45:01 -0800
Better combustion chamber. Shorter flame front travel and reduced 
stagnate end gas areas.
The end gas areas are a primary source of combustion instability ( pre 
ignition and detonation)

Very superior with gas. I don't know about fuel. (I now nothing about 
using nitro and little about alcohol)

Bryan


ardunbill@webtv.net wrote:

>One of my West Coast Vincent friends, 
>Bill Martz, who enjoys the Ardun and LSR items I send him from our List,
>wanted to pose a question to the technical experts here.  Bill was half
>of the Martz-Auger team that was famous in Southern California for years
>in the '50s, campaigning a 90% nitro Vincent Black Lightning mc on the
>dragstrips.  He was the technical side, and his pal Tommy Auger was the
>fearless lightweight rider.  Some of you with white hair like me may
>remember them from Hot Rod in that era.  They sometimes got the ink.
>
>Bill's question is, what are the advantages of the four-valve head of
>today compared with the traditional two-valve hemi head design(still
>very much with us)?  Thanks, Ardun Bill

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed
///  what is needed.  It isn't that difficult, folks.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>