land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Driving a race car to the salt.

To: <Flowbench@aol.com>, <Jimwprice@aol.com>, <land-speed@Autox.Team.Net>
Subject: RE: Driving a race car to the salt.
From: "James Tone" <James.Tone@AES.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:30:44 -0700
Your absoluty right. I reinspected the car after each the many spins. One 
problem during the primary inspection was  the driver could not start or turn 
off the engine with the arm restraints on...all the switches were on the dash 
and were not reachable and had to be rerouted to the roll cage...I wonder if 
anyone checked the 553 car...Street driven cars are funny that way. Acually 
happened in about 97 or  98.. The car was also illegal and would have been 
thrown out of impiounds if it had qualified...It was not an exact copy of a 
32...Doors too long, windshield lip missing, area behind the rear wheel well 
changed...etc.  .J.D.  Beautifull though especially with that cammer Ford for 
power

-From: Flowbench@aol.com [mailto:Flowbench@aol.com]
S
In a message dated 10/21/04 5:12:32 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
Jimwprice@aol.com writes:

> Does any one know if another car has driven as far as the 553 Roadster did 
> this year to set a record over 200?

Frank Currie drove his roadster from Anaheim to the salt, got a timing slip 
of 205 or so THEN drove it to Plesanton for a street rod event. By the way he 
installed the roll cage at the salt, spun the car a couple of time at 195 or so 
then put Duane McKinney in the car for the time slip of 200+. The year? 
around '93? Dan, Glenn, anyone?
Mike 

*

________________________________________________________________________
This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains 
information that may be privileged, confidential or copyrighted under law.  If 
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby formally notified that any 
use, copying or distribution of this e-Mail, in whole or in part, is strictly 
prohibited. Please notify the sender by return e-Mail and delete this e-Mail 
from your system.  Unless explicitly and conspicuously stated in the subject 
matter of the above e-Mail, this e-Mail does not constitute a contract offer, a 
contract amendment, or an acceptance of a contract offer.  This e-Mail does not 
constitute consent to the use of sender's contact information for direct 
marketing purposes or for transfers of data to third parties.

This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs service.






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>